课题基金 / 基金详情

Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Economic Voting Dynamics

Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Economic Voting Dynamics
政治学博士论文研究:经济投票动态
批准号:
1420872
负责人:
Jim Granato
金额:
$0.27万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2014
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2014-07-01 至 2015-06-30

项目摘要

项目成果

Jim Granato的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
理性党派理论(RPT)是一种备受推崇的经济投票理论,研究货币政策对选举的影响。该理论认为,党派间的通胀冲击遵循中期周期,这意味着货币政策在中期选举中很重要,但在年度选举中则无关紧要。然而,最近的经验证据显示,通胀与选举的关系已经减弱;相反,失业问题在选举中仍然很重要。然而,货币政策的两个组成部分之间不断变化的选举动态的性质尚不清楚。为了解决这个难题,本研究调查了最近货币政策发展对选举的影响,特别是积极的通货膨胀稳定——经济投票研究中一个未被充分研究的领域。这项研究的智力价值在于它将宏观经济政策中的最新概念应用于理解经济投票的趋势。因此,该研究发展并整合了理论和统计模型,以纠正RPT下的通货膨胀中期周期,并将RPT扩展到检查失业政策的党派影响。首先,通过通货膨胀预期的理论和行为概念与通货膨胀持续性的统计概念的整合,研究假设通货膨胀稳定化调节了选民对年度选举结果的不确定性,从而导致中期通货膨胀政策中性。其次,尽管通胀政策已经去政治化,但失业政策仍然是自由裁量的,而且受制于党派力量。利用党派政策和选民对失业严重程度的看法的二维决策模型,该研究检验了选民总是奖励长期政策,但根据其表现奖励或惩罚短期政策的假设。然而,选民的行为被进一步假定为受收入水平的制约。这项研究的广泛影响是双重的。首先,自20世纪80年代以来,对通胀稳定的强调导致了低通胀。在某种程度上,经济稳定是非常可取的,商业周期的这种“大缓和”证明了宏观经济管理的成功。然而,正如我们从2008年金融危机中学到的那样,这项政策也有其局限性。正如本研究所指出的那样,对选举的影响反映了货币政策的不平衡:虽然通货膨胀最近不再是选举问题,但失业仍然是一个需要不时解决的问题。在缺乏有效的货币政策来稳定失业率波动的情况下,公众将继续向执政党寻求答案。研究表明,稳定的通货膨胀可以促进更高的产出/稳定的失业率。因此,货币政策制定者面临的挑战是完善政策工具,以实现“通胀-产出的稳定”,就像上世纪80年代和90年代那样。最近旨在减少失业的政策措施,如明智地使用量化宽松政策,既符合上述对RPT的改进,也符合通胀目标制的进展。
英文摘要
A highly-regarded economic voting theory examining the electoral effects of monetary policy, the Rational Partisan Theory (RPT), posits that partisan inflation shocks follow the midterm cycle, implying that monetary policy matters in midterm elections but not during on-year elections. Yet, recent empirical evidence shows inflation has become less relevant electorally; instead, unemployment still matters in elections. The nature of the changing electoral dynamics between the two components of monetary policy is unclear, however. In order to solve the puzzle, this study investigates the electoral implications of recent monetary policy developments, in particular, the aggressive inflation stabilization - an understudied area in economic voting research. The intellectual merit of the study lies in its application of recent concepts in macroeconomic policy to understand trends in economic voting. Accordingly, the study develops and integrates theoretical and statistical models to rectify the midterm cycle of inflation under the RPT, and to extend the RPT to examine the partisan effects of unemployment policy. First, through the integration of theoretical and behavioral concept of inflation expectations and the statistical concept of inflation persistence, the study posits inflation stabilization moderates voters' uncertainty of on-year election outcomes, resulting in inflation policy neutrality at midterms. Second, while inflation policy is de-politicized, unemployment policy remains discretionary and is subject to partisan forces. Using a two-dimensional decision-making model of partisan policy and voter perceptions on unemployment severity, the study tests the assumption that voters always reward long-term policy but reward or punish short-term policy based on its performance. Voter behavior, however, is further assumed to be conditioned by income levels.The broader impacts of the study are twofold. First, the emphasis on inflation stabilization has resulted in low inflation since the 1980s. To the extent that economic stability is highly desirable, this "great moderation" of the business cycle is a testament to the success of macroeconomic management. Yet, the policy has its limitations, as we have learned from the 2008 financial crisis. The electoral implications, as this study argues, reflect a monetary policy imbalance: while inflation ceases to be an election issue in recent time, unemployment remains a problem to be solved from time to time. In the absence of an effective monetary policy to stabilize unemployment volatility, the public will continue to turn to the political party in power for answers. Research has shown that inflation stability can contribute to greater output/unemployment stability. The challenge to monetary policymaker, therefore, is on perfecting the policy tool to achieve "inflation-output costabilization", as it did during the 1980s and 1990s. Recent policy measures aiming at reducing unemployment, such as the judicious use of quantitative easing, are consistent with both the refinements to RPT posited above but also with advances made in inflation targeting.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
RAPID: Hurricane Harvey: Experiences, Recovery and Future Policies
  • 批准号:
    1760292
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $20.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 负责人:
    Jim Granato
  • 依托单位:
WORKSHOP: Support for Graduates Students at the University of Houston EITM Summer Training Institute
  • 批准号:
    1324203
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $16.43万
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 负责人:
    Jim Granato
  • 依托单位:
Workshop: New Models for Reducing Barriers between Researchers and Communities, April 8-9, 2010, University of Houston.
  • 批准号:
    1032305
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $1.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 负责人:
    Jim Granato
  • 依托单位:
RAPID: The Houston Region Foreclosure Study: A Panel Survey
  • 批准号:
    0943354
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $20.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 负责人:
    Jim Granato
  • 依托单位:
海外基金