Exploring Biological Evidence: Helping Students Understand the Richness and Complexity of Evidentiary Constructs in Biology

探索生物证据：帮助学生理解生物学证据结构的丰富性和复杂性

• 批准号: 1661124
• 负责人: Ala Samarapungavan
• 金额: $ 127.02万
• 依托单位: Purdue University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2017-09-01 至 2022-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1661124&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Exploring; Biological; Evidence; Helping; Students

This proposal was submitted in response to EHR Core Research (ECR) program announcement NSF 15-509. The ECR program of fundamental research in STEM education provides funding in critical research areas that are essential, broad and enduring. EHR seeks proposals that will help synthesize, build and/or expand research foundations in the following focal areas: STEM learning, STEM learning environments, STEM workforce development, and broadening participation in STEM. The ECR program is distinguished by its emphasis on the accumulation of robust evidence to inform efforts to (a) understand, (b) build theory to explain, and (c) suggest interventions (and innovations) to address persistent challenges in STEM interest, education, learning, and participation. The proposed study will explore trajectories of development in high school and undergraduate students' understanding of evidence in the context of biology teaching and learning. One of the difficulties experienced by many science learners is that they do not fully understand the evidence base that underpins contemporary science. This study will examine students' developing understanding of evidence in the context of biology learning. This research will contribute to fundamental knowledge on STEM learning and STEM learning environments by providing information on trajectories of development in students' understanding and use of evidence as a central part of their learning in biology through the secondary and post-secondary years. The project will also provide information on how variations in how teachers and instructional materials support students' understanding and reasoning about evidence influence this development. The instructional resources developed as part of this project (e.g., grade band appropriate teacher guides and exemplars of supported assignments and assessments) will be of direct value to biology educators. The outcomes of this study will help educators better prepare students who want to pursue careers in science, including research careers. Furthermore, knowledge developed by the project may support the development of scientific literacy and participation in evidence-based decision making around public policy on scientific issues among citizens.The project will use a design-based research approach to achieve the following objectives: a) Develop a conceptual analysis of varied facets of disciplinary evidence that are important to evolutionary thinking in biology learning; b) Describe trajectories of learning in high school and undergraduate students' understanding and use of biological evidence for evolution; c) Examine how variations in instructional scaffolding relate to patterns of student learning within each grade band; and d) Develop design knowledge to facilitate integration of disciplinary evidence scaffolding in high school and undergraduate biology instruction. First, data will be collected on what students know and learn about biological evidence in the context of routine biology instruction. Subsequently the team will integrate instructional scaffolds that foster more nuanced and multifaceted understandings of biological evidence. Two variations will be examined: 1) Generic evidence scaffolds will remind students of different aspects of using evidence in science (e.g. "refer to all the evidence when constructing an explanation"), but without explicit links to relevant disciplinary knowledge for each aspect. 2) disciplinary evidence scaffolds will explicitly remind students of key disciplinary knowledge related to each aspect of evidence. The project will use a mixed method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative cognitive science techniques to collect and analyze data from a) student learning artifacts, b) pre and posttests of biology content knowledge, and their understanding and use of evidence in biology, c) videotaped classroom lessons, and d) interviews with teachers and students. These methods will allow for quantitative comparisons of group performance across the two instructional conditions and supplement these comparisons with rich descriptive data about how students learn in varied instructional contexts.

该提案是针对电子病历核心研究(ECR)计划公告NSF 15-509而提交的。ECR STEM教育基础研究计划为关键的研究领域提供资金，这些领域是基本的、广泛的和持久的。EHR寻求的建议将有助于综合、建立和/或扩大以下重点领域的研究基础：STEM学习、STEM学习环境、STEM劳动力发展和扩大STEM的参与。ECR计划的特点是强调积累可靠的证据，为(A)理解、(B)建立解释理论和(C)建议干预措施(和创新)以应对STEM兴趣、教育、学习和参与方面的持续挑战提供信息。本研究将探讨高中生和本科生在生物教学背景下对证据理解的发展轨迹。许多科学学习者所经历的困难之一是，他们不能完全理解支撑当代科学的证据基础。本研究将在生物学习的背景下考察学生对证据的发展理解。这项研究将通过提供关于学生理解和使用证据的发展轨迹的信息，帮助了解STEM学习和STEM学习环境的基本知识，作为他们在中学和中学后几年生物学学习的核心部分。该项目还将提供有关教师和教材如何支持学生对证据的理解和推理的变化如何影响这一发展的信息。作为这一项目的一部分而开发的教学资源(例如，适当的年级等级教师指南以及所支持的作业和评估的范例)将对生物教育工作者具有直接价值。这项研究的结果将帮助教育工作者为希望从事科学事业的学生做好更好的准备，包括研究职业。此外，该项目开发的知识可以支持公民的科学素养的发展和参与围绕科学问题的公共政策的循证决策。该项目将使用基于设计的研究方法来实现以下目标：a)对生物学习中对进化思维重要的学科证据的不同方面进行概念分析；b)描述高中生和本科生对生物学证据用于进化的理解和使用的轨迹；c)研究教学支架的变化如何与每个年级范围内的学生的学习模式有关；以及d)开发设计知识，以促进高中和本科生物学教学中学科证据支架的整合。首先，将在常规生物学教学的背景下收集学生对生物证据的了解和学习的数据。随后，该团队将整合教学支架，促进对生物学证据的更细微和多方面的理解。我们将考察两种不同的形式：1)通用证据脚手架将提醒学生在科学中使用证据的不同方面(例如“在构建解释时参考所有证据”)，但没有明确链接到每个方面的相关学科知识。2)纪律证据脚手架将明确提醒学生与证据各方面相关的关键纪律知识。该项目将使用混合方法，结合定性和定量认知科学技术来收集和分析数据，这些数据来自a)学生学习人工制品，b)生物学内容知识的前后测试，以及他们对生物学证据的理解和使用，c)课堂录像，以及d)对教师和学生的采访。这些方法将允许对两种教学条件下的群体表现进行定量比较，并用丰富的描述性数据补充这些比较，说明学生在不同的教学环境中是如何学习的。

项目成果

The Conceptual Analysis of Disciplinary Evidence (CADE) framework as a guide for evidentiary reasoning: A practical implementation in a Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) laboratory investigation

作为证据推理指南的纪律证据概念分析 (CADE) 框架：哈代-温伯格平衡 (HWE) 实验室调查的实际实施

• DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2022.2100450
• 发表时间: 2022
• 期刊: Journal of Biological Education
• 影响因子: 1.1
• 作者: Liu, Chaonan;Dreger, Dayna L.;Liu, Shiyao;Samarapungavan, Ala;Gardner, Stephanie M.;Clase, Kari L.;Pelaez, Nancy
• 通讯作者: Pelaez, Nancy