Indication and importance of educational orders according to § 10 JGG.

通过1990年第1号JGGÄndG，立法者打算加强青少年刑法中的教育原则，对青少年的生活行为产生积极影响，将进一步的教育措施纳入JGG第10条的教育命令目录，作为JGG （Erziehungsmaßregeln）的教育限制的一部分。对犯罪统计数据的分析和一系列档案审查的结果通常被解释为表明立法者的目的是强制恢复短期青少年拘留（Jugendarrest）作为一种矫正措施（Zuchtmittel），而不暂停的青少年拘留尚未实现。关于教育命令，与旨在惩罚错误的矫正命令相比，其实际重要性在质量上的丧失更为突出。然而，我对犯罪统计数字和法庭档案的初步分析表明，这些估计并不能完全充分反映现实。相反，关于教育命令是（或已经成为）一种重要的定性和适当的工具，对社会传记上处于不利地位的少年犯的犯罪作出实质性的教育反应，这一猜想不仅适用于轻微的犯罪。本评估的指定目标是检查并在适当的情况下验证前面提到的猜想。

By way of the 1st JGGÄndG of 1990 the legislator intended to strengthen the principle of education in juvenile criminal law in the sense of a positive influence on juveniles conduct of life by integrating further educational measures in the catalogue of educational orders in § 10 JGG as one part of the educational restrictions of the JGG (Erziehungsmaßregeln). Findings from the analysis of crime statistics and a series of file reviews are commonly interpreted as indicating that the legislators aim to force back short-time juvenile detention (Jugendarrest) as a correctional measure (Zuchtmittel) and unsuspended youth custody had not been realized. With regard to educational orders a qualitative loss of practical importance in relation to correctional orders, which are directed at punishing wrong, is accentuated. Own preliminary analyses of crime statistics and court files, however, suggest that these estimations do not reflect reality entirely sufficiently. On the contrary, the conjecture that educational orders are (or have become) an important qualitative and suitable tool of substantial educational reaction to offences of also socio-biographically disadvantaged juvenile offenders, which is applied to more than only petty offences. The designated target of this evaluation is to examine and, where appropriate, to verify the previously mentioned conjecture.