权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Identity and Difference in Form of Thought and Metaphor: Coverage and Interference Analysis of two Theological Forms of Thought in Relation to the Body-of-Christ-Metaphor

思想形式与隐喻的同一与差异：两种神学思想形式与基督身体隐喻相关的覆盖与干扰分析

基本信息

批准号：
237712250
负责人：
Professor Dr. Rainer Kampling, since 4/2017
金额：
--
依托单位：
Seminar für Katholische Theologie (WE 6)
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2013
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2012-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/237712250?language=en
关键词：
Identity Difference Form Thought Metaphor

项目摘要

The analysis of thought-forms is one of the most innovative areas of theological research. In the German-speaking theology two prominent forms of thought stand opposite: On the one hand the Thought of Difference and on the other hand the Thought of Unity. Pröpper, Striet among others reformulate the god-earth-relationship in categories of freedom and take it as a strict relationship of difference. In comparison Müller reflects it in a monistical-based subject philosophy as considerably determined by the moment of unity.The research project does not aim at establishing the range or the problem-solving-potential of both thought-forms in direct comparison, but rather by a piece of material dogmatics that revolves around the tension between identity and difference in relations of the finite to the absolute that occurs in both thought-forms: the Body-of-Christ term. In doing so the material focus will be on the ecclesiological use of the Body-of-Christ-Metaphor in the 19th and 20th century: the finite subjects will be integrated in the mystic body of Christ and thus form the church. The surplus of the metaphors meaning is used to subject both thought-forms to an endurance test about their heuristic capacity and the limits of their validation strength: what paradigm concentrates particularly on which aspects of the Body-of-Christ-Ecclesiology? What metaphorical contents cannot or hardly be made visible in a thought-form specific way? Occurring interference with the test object can help making the structural logic of the Body-of-Christ term become more transparent. The medium of consideration itself will be reconfigured during this process by immersing it into the parameter of the respective thought-form.The application plans with two different material objects. On the one hand Johann Adam Möhler (1796-1838) is in the center of attention. His romantic-organological Body-of-Christ-Ecclesiology (church as continued incarnation) is attested in parts of the secondary literature a tendency towards Thought of Unity (panentheism). On the other hand the Body-of-Christ-Ecclesiology has to be analyzed within the German language area between the nineteen-twenties and nineteen-forties. A flood of to some extent extreme christomonistic drafts results in a radical deconstruction of this ontological loaded metaphor (Koster) in 1940. So we can call this a period of transition of the Body-of-Christ-Ecclesiology.The yield of the project first of all consists of the range analysis of two prominent theological thought-forms which are proved in their problem-solving-potential. Secondly, the project will make a methodical innovative contribution to the history of the Body-of-Christ-Ecclesiology in the 19th and 20th century. Thirdly, it lies in a critical relocation of the ecclesiological metaphor. Finally an analysis of considerably cultural policy concerning intern identity constructs and strategies of differentiation outwards in the area of religion is in prospect.

对思想形态的分析是神学研究中最具创新性的领域之一。在德语神学思想的两个突出形式的立场相反：一方面的差异，另一方面的统一思想的思想。Pröpper，Striet等人在自由的范畴中重新阐述了神-地-关系，并将其视为严格的差异关系。在比较中，穆勒反映了它在一个一元论基础上的主体哲学，因为它在很大程度上是由统一的时刻决定的。研究项目的目的不是建立直接比较中两种思想形式的范围或解决问题的潜力，而是通过一个物质教义学，围绕着两种思想形式中发生的有限与绝对关系中的同一性和差异之间的张力：基督的身体这个词在这样做的材料重点将是在教会使用的身体的基督隐喻在19和20世纪：有限的科目将被整合在神秘的身体基督，从而形成教会。隐喻意义的过剩被用来使两种思想形态经受关于它们的启发能力和它们的验证强度的极限的耐力测试：什么样的范式特别集中在基督教会学的哪些方面？什么隐喻的内容不能或几乎不能以一种思想形态的特定方式显现？排除对测试对象的干扰有助于使基督身体术语的结构逻辑变得更加透明。在这个过程中，考虑的媒介本身将被重新配置，通过把它浸入到各自思想形态的参数中。一方面，约翰·亚当·穆勒（Johann Adam Möhler，1796-1838）是人们关注的焦点。他的浪漫器官学的基督教会学（教会作为继续化身）是证明了部分二级文献的倾向，对思想的统一（泛神论）。另一方面，基督教会的身体必须在20世纪20年代和40年代之间的德语区进行分析。1940年，大量极端的基督论草案导致了对这种本体论隐喻的彻底解构。因此，我们可以称之为基督身体-教会学的过渡时期。该项目的成果首先包括对两种突出的神学思想形式的范围分析，这两种思想形式被证明具有解决问题的潜力。第二，该项目将对19和20世纪基督身体教会学的历史做出有条理的创新贡献。第三，对教会学隐喻进行了批判性的重新定位。最后，对宗教领域内涉及到内部身份建构和向外分化策略的重要文化政策进行了前景分析。