权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

GCR: Collaborative Research: Socio-Technological System Transitions: Michigan Community & Anishinaabe Renewable Energy Systems

GCR：合作研究：社会技术系统转型：密歇根社区

基本信息

批准号：
1934346
负责人：
Kathleen Halvorsen
金额：
$ 272.36万
依托单位：
Michigan Technological University
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
Continuing Grant
财政年份：
2019
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2019-10-01 至 2025-09-30
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1934346&HistoricalAwards=false
关键词：
GCR Collaborative Research Socio Technological

项目摘要

The objective of this Growing Convergence Research project is to lay the foundations for a convergent, transdisciplinary field of study focused on understanding transitions in socio-technological systems. This project aims to converge social science theories of values and motivation with engineering and economics understandings of technological feasibility to develop a comprehensive understanding of how and why energy systems, in particular, are reconfigured to include renewable energy resources. This project brings together scholars from resource management, chemical and materials engineering, electrical engineering, sociology, energy policy, philosophy of science, and regional planning to simultaneously explore the social, cultural, and technological dimensions of energy system transitions. The project will investigate energy system transitions in eight case communities (two Anishinaabe Tribal Nations and six non-tribal Michigan communities) that vary along characteristics key to understanding energy transitions - including rural vs. urban, renewable energy sources, degree of transition, governance, and type of utility provider. Project sub-teams will a) engage with community partners to explore how communities understand and envision energy transitions; b) examine risks, barriers, and opportunities for energy transitions; and c) develop an integrated spatial model and decision support tool to study the trade-offs between strategies, spaces, and futures.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

这个不断增长的融合研究项目的目标是为一个专注于理解社会技术系统转型的融合、跨学科研究领域奠定基础。该项目旨在将价值和动机的社会科学理论与技术可行性的工程和经济学理解结合起来，以全面理解能源系统，特别是如何以及为什么要重新配置以包括可再生能源。该项目汇集了来自资源管理、化学与材料工程、电气工程、社会学、能源政策、科学哲学和区域规划的学者，同时探索能源系统转型的社会、文化和技术层面。该项目将调查八个案例社区（两个Anishinaabe部落国家和六个非部落密歇根社区）的能源系统转型，这些社区在理解能源转型的关键特征上各不相同，包括农村与城市、可再生能源、转型程度、治理和公用事业提供商类型。项目子团队将a)与社区合作伙伴合作，探索社区如何理解和设想能源转型；B)研究能源转型的风险、障碍和机遇；c)开发综合空间模型和决策支持工具，研究策略、空间和未来之间的权衡。该奖项反映了美国国家科学基金会的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（12）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

Rallying the anti-crowd: Organized opposition, democratic deficit, and a potential social gap in large-scale solar energy

集结反群众：有组织的反对派、民主赤字以及大规模太阳能的潜在社会差距

DOI：
10.1016/j.erss.2022.102597
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
Energy Research & Social Science
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Crawford, Jessica;Bessette, Douglas;Mills, Sarah B.
通讯作者：
Mills, Sarah B.

Energy policy for energy sovereignty: Can policy tools enhance energy sovereignty?

能源主权的能源政策：政策工具能否增强能源主权？

DOI：
10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.056
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
Solar Energy
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Schelly, Chelsea;Bessette, Douglas;Brosemer, Kathleen;Gagnon, Valoree;Arola, Kristin L.;Fiss, Andrew;Pearce, Joshua M.;Halvorsen, Kathleen E.
通讯作者：
Halvorsen, Kathleen E.

Preferences and perceived barriers to pursuing energy sovereignty and renewable energy: A tribal nations perspective

DOI：
10.1016/j.erss.2023.102967
发表时间：
2023-02-02
期刊：
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Lee，Don;Schelly，Chelsea;Tiwari，Shardul
通讯作者：
Tiwari，Shardul

Enacting boundaries or building bridges? Language and engagement in food-energy-water systems science

制定边界还是搭建桥梁？

DOI：
10.1007/s42532-022-00110-0
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
Socio-Ecological Practice Research
影响因子：
0
作者：
Gagnon, Valoree S.;Schelly, Chelsea;Lytle, William;Kliskey, Andrew;Dale, Virginia H.;Marshall, Anna-Maria;Rodriguez, Luis F.;Williams, Paula;Price, Michael Waasegiizhig;Redd, Elizabeth A.
通讯作者：
Redd, Elizabeth A.

Cultural imaginaries or incommensurable ontologies? Relationality and sovereignty as worldviews in socio-technological system transitions

文化想象还是不可通约的本体论？