Collaborative Research: Prescribed Burning Decisions and Risk-Risk Tradeoffs

合作研究：规定的燃烧决策和风险-风险权衡

• 批准号: 2219505
• 负责人: Katherine Dickinson
• 金额: $ 43.33万
• 依托单位: University of Colorado at Denver-Downtown Campus
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2022-08-15 至 2025-07-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2219505&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Collaborative; Research; Prescribed; Burning; Decisions

Wildfires and their environmental and social impacts are growing in the US and around the world. Prescribed (Rx) burning can be an effective management technique to reduce vegetation and reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires. Despite its potential benefits, the annual extent of Rx burning has stayed the same or decreased across much of the country in recent years. This is due in part to the fact that Rx burning entails its own risks, including smoke exposure and the possibility of a planned fire escaping control. Making Rx burning decisions requires making informed tradeoffs between these risks and the risks associated with uncontrolled wildfires. To inform these decisions, this project assesses two key questions. First, how do decisions by those who implement Rx burning and by residents in nearby communities shape potential Rx burning impacts? To answer this question, the research team takes measurements near a large number of Rx burn sites over time, capturing information such as how much smoke residents near Rx burns are exposed to and whether experience with Rx burning influences support for this management approach. Second, how do perceived risk-risk tradeoffs influence support for expanded Rx burning to mitigate wildfire risk among wildland-urban interface (WUI) and non-WUI residents? To answer this question, the researchers survey residents in WUI and non-WUI areas to understand risk perceptions and policy support. Understanding these tradeoffs is critical to shaping risk management policy. Prescribed (Rx) burning entails carefully planned fires lit under controlled conditions to manage fuels that can spur catastrophic fires and WUI community disasters. The US National Cohesive Wildland Management Strategy identifies Rx burning as a cost-effective solution, but its use has remained limited, particularly in the American West. Managing wildfire and other climate-related hazards involves weighing risk-risk tradeoffs in order to develop effective, balanced strategies that protect communities and the environment. This interdisciplinary project uses a mixed-methods approach to advance knowledge on decision making under risk in the context of natural hazard management. The researchers develop a novel conceptual model that adapts the concept of risk-risk tradeoffs to the context of Rx burning decisions. This conceptual model guides the interdisciplinary research design to address two key research questions: 1) How do decisions by implementers and residents shape Rx burning impacts for WUI communities in proximity to Rx burn sites? To answer this question, the team generates and analyzes a first-of-its-kind dataset integrating measurements of environmental conditions, smoke emissions, built environment (housing) characteristics, air quality, exposure, health, and perceived experience measures near Rx burn sites over multiple years. 2) How do perceived risk-risk tradeoffs influence support for expanded Rx burning to mitigate wildfire risk among WUI and non-WUI residents? The team implements a large survey-based choice experiment to elicit risk-risk tradeoffs and assess Rx burning support, analyzing data to understand how different risk attributes and individual characteristics shape risk perceptions and policy support. The research team is engaging with stakeholders, including policy-makers and regulators, wildfire managers and Rx burn implementers, and members of the public, throughout the research process to ensure that the results are relevant and useful.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

野火及其对环境和社会的影响在美国和世界各地都在增长。规定（Rx）燃烧可以是减少植被和减少灾难性野火风险的有效管理技术。尽管有潜在的好处，但近年来，全国大部分地区每年的Rx燃烧程度保持不变或有所下降。这部分是由于Rx燃烧有其自身的风险，包括烟雾暴露和计划火灾逃逸控制的可能性。做出Rx燃烧的决定需要在这些风险与不受控制的野火相关的风险之间做出明智的权衡。为了给这些决策提供信息，本项目评估了两个关键问题。首先，实施Rx燃烧的人和附近社区居民的决定如何影响Rx燃烧的潜在影响？为了回答这个问题，研究小组在大量Rx烧伤地点附近进行了长期测量，获取了诸如Rx烧伤附近居民暴露在多少烟雾中的信息，以及Rx燃烧的经验是否影响了对这种管理方法的支持。其次，感知到的风险-风险权衡如何影响在荒地-城市界面（WUI）和非WUI居民中对扩大Rx燃烧以减轻野火风险的支持？为了回答这个问题，研究人员调查了WUI和非WUI地区的居民，以了解风险认知和政策支持。理解这些权衡对于制定风险管理政策至关重要。规定（Rx）燃烧需要在受控条件下仔细规划火灾，以管理可能引发灾难性火灾和WUI社区灾难的燃料。美国国家凝聚力野生土地管理战略将Rx焚烧确定为一种具有成本效益的解决方案，但其使用仍然有限，特别是在美国西部。管理野火和其他与气候有关的灾害需要权衡风险-风险权衡，以便制定有效、平衡的战略，保护社区和环境。这个跨学科项目采用混合方法，在自然灾害管理的背景下提高风险下决策的知识。研究人员开发了一种新的概念模型，将风险-风险权衡的概念适应于Rx燃烧决策的背景。该概念模型指导跨学科研究设计，以解决两个关键研究问题：1)实施者和居民的决策如何影响Rx燃烧对Rx燃烧地点附近WUI社区的影响？为了回答这个问题，该团队生成并分析了首个同类数据集，该数据集集成了多年来Rx烧伤地点附近的环境条件、烟雾排放、建筑环境（住房）特征、空气质量、暴露、健康和感知体验测量。2)感知风险-风险权衡如何影响对扩大Rx燃烧以减轻WUI和非WUI居民野火风险的支持？该团队实施了一项基于调查的大型选择实验，以得出风险-风险权衡并评估Rx燃烧支持，分析数据以了解不同的风险属性和个人特征如何影响风险认知和政策支持。在整个研究过程中，研究小组正在与包括决策者和监管机构、野火管理者和Rx燃烧实施者以及公众在内的利益攸关方进行接触，以确保结果具有相关性和实用性。该奖项反映了美国国家科学基金会的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。