课题基金 / 基金详情

Rural Veteran Personality, Delay Discounting, and the Interference Preservation Hypothesis

Rural Veteran Personality, Delay Discounting, and the Interference Preservation Hypothesis
农村退伍军人人格、延迟贴现和干扰保护假说
批准号:
2321159
负责人:
Justin McDaniel
金额:
$34.16万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2023
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2023-09-01 至 2026-08-31

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
从现役军人到平民生活的过渡是具有挑战性的。从军队退休后找到工作很重要,尤其是因为这是健康和福祉的主要社会决定因素。在伊利诺伊州,只有3%的退伍军人(全国为7%)受雇于科学,工程,技术或数学(STEM)职业。此外,农村退伍军人在STEM工作的可能性比城市退伍军人低近50%。由于许多退伍军人生活在农村地区,在STEM领域缺乏代表性,因此非常需要为居住在农村的退伍军人提供STEM培训机会。南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校的这个项目将寻求从伊利诺伊州最南端的16个县招募180多名大学生退伍军人,这是一个联邦指定的低社会经济地位地区,参加为期17周的培训计划,重点是计算机编程,数据科学和计算机器学习分类模型。以及教育研究方法的专业发展。在培训计划中的一个新颖的实验将测试一个迄今未说明的研究假设。延迟的表现反馈(7天)有利于上级的培训表现在“时间2”比即时反馈是一致的Kulhavy和安德森的干扰保留假说。虽然人们可能会表现出对现在的偏见,这是一个基本的行为经济学原则,通常通过延迟折扣措施(即,“我更喜欢我现在能得到的”),延迟的奖励或反馈可能会带来上级的结果。在学习和训练任务绩效的背景下,延迟反馈可以为学习者提供足够的时间来忘记不正确的过程。然而,与前面的讨论平行,个性已被证明与学习过程和差异训练任务绩效密切相关,但没有研究调查人格类型是否调节反馈时间和训练任务绩效之间的关系。因此,在“时间2”提高任务绩效的努力可能需要个性化的方法。本项目旨在通过两组随机对照试验来验证这一假设。重要的是,延迟折扣(一种衡量冲动的行为经济学指标)和学习风格将受到控制,以隔离个性的独特影响。结果可能会导致干扰保存假设的分水岭修改。该项目由NSF的EDU核心研究:STEM教育研究能力建设(BCSER)项目提供支持,该项目旨在培养研究人员开展高质量STEM教育研究的能力。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,通过使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估,被认为值得支持。
英文摘要
The transition from active-duty military service to civilian life is challenging. Securing a job following retirement from the military is important, not least because it is a major social determinant of health and wellbeing. Only 3% of military veterans in Illinois - compared to 7% nationally - are employed in science, engineering, technology, or mathematics (STEM) occupations. Furthermore, rural-dwelling veterans are nearly 50% less likely than urban-dwelling veterans to work in STEM. Because many veterans live in rural areas and lack representation in STEM fields, there is a considerable need to provide STEM training opportunities to rural-dwelling veterans. This project at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale will seek to recruit more than 180 college student veterans from the 16 southernmost counties in Illinois, a federally designated region of low socioeconomic status, for participation in a 17-week training program focused on computer programming, data science, and calculating machine learning classification models, as well as professional development in education research methods.A novel experiment within the training program will test a heretofore unstated research hypothesis. Delayed performance feedback ( 7 days) facilitates superior training performance at "time 2" over immediate feedback with is consistent with Kulhavy and Anderson's interference preservation hypothesis. While people may exhibit bias for the present, which is a foundational behavioral economics principle typically operationalized by delay discounting measures (i.e., "I prefer what I can get now"), delayed rewards or feedback may render superior outcomes. In the context of learning and training task performance, delayed feedback may provide enough time for learners to forget incorrect processes. However, paralleling the forgoing discussion, personality has been shown to be intricately associated with learning processes and differential training task performance, yet no study has investigated whether personality type moderates the relationship between feedback timing and training task performance. Therefore, efforts at enhancing task performance at "time 2" may require a personalized approach. This project aims to test the hypothesis in a two-group randomized controlled trial. Importantly, delay discounting - a behavioral economic measure of impulsivity - and learning style will be controlled for so as to isolate the unique effect of personality. Results could lead to a watershed modification of the interference preservation hypothesis. The project is supported by NSF's EDU Core Research: Building Capacity for STEM Education Research (BCSER) program, which is designed to build investigators' capacity to carry out high-quality STEM education research.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金