RAPID: Constitutional Change and Public Support for Minority Rights

RAPID:宪法变革和公众对少数群体权利的支持

基本信息

项目摘要

The protection of minority rights is a hallmark of modern liberal democracy. To do so, democracies often rely on constitutional guarantees. Where such rights do not already exist, however, formally guaranteeing minority rights often requires carrying out constitutional change. Despite the political, social, and economic significance of amending a constitution, scholars have yet to fully evaluate whether constitutional change translates into changes in how citizens view minority rights and, relatedly, the views of minority citizens themselves. As a result, it remains both undertheorized and understudied whether attempts at constitutional change engender greater public acceptance of minority rights or, alternatively, instigate a backlash against them. Moreover, it is unclear how such efforts might strengthen – or undermine – minority citizens’ sense of political efficacy and support for the political system. The answers to these questions thus have important implications for the quality and stability of liberal democratic governance. The project engages with this limitation of existing work by examining the political impact of attempts at constitutional change with a comparative approach to data collection and research. To do so, the project leverages the unique conditions created by a referendum and its impact on support for an oft-overlooked form of minority rights, indigenous rights. The referendum asks citizens to either adopt or reject a constitutional amendment formally recognizing indigenous rights and creating an indigenous advisory body. Using a public opinion survey fielded in the period immediately preceding and following the referendum, the project will yield insights into (a) the impacts of the referendum on public support for minority rights; (b) the extent to which such an effect is conditioned by pre-existing support for minority rights; and (c) the impact of the referendum’s outcome on the political attitudes and efficacy of minority citizens. In doing so, the project represents a unique examination of a constitutional referendum’s impact on political attitudes and an important expansion of the existing literature on public support for minority rights in general and Indigenous rights in particular. Moreover, the findings from this research will yield insights into the consequences of attempts at constitutional change for minority citizens’ attachment and trust in the political system.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
保护少数人的权利是现代自由民主的标志。要做到这一点,民主国家往往依赖宪法保障。然而,在尚不存在这种权利的地方,正式保障少数群体的权利往往需要进行宪法改革。尽管修改宪法具有政治、社会和经济意义,但学者们还没有充分评估宪法修改是否会改变公民对少数民族权利的看法,以及与此相关的少数民族公民自己的看法。因此,关于修改宪法的尝试是否会使公众更好地接受少数群体的权利,或者是否会引起对这些权利的强烈反对,仍然没有充分的理论和研究。此外,尚不清楚这些努力如何加强-或削弱-少数群体公民的政治效能感和对政治制度的支持。因此,这些问题的答案对自由民主治理的质量和稳定性具有重要意义。该项目利用现有工作的这一局限性,通过对数据收集和研究采取比较方法,审查试图修改宪法的政治影响。为此,该项目利用了全民投票所创造的独特条件及其对支持一种经常被忽视的少数群体权利形式-土著权利的影响。公民投票要求公民通过或拒绝正式承认土著权利并建立土著咨询机构的宪法修正案。该项目将利用公民投票前后进行的民意调查,深入了解(a)公民投票对公众支持少数群体权利的影响;(B)这种影响在多大程度上取决于先前对少数群体权利的支持;(c)公民投票结果对少数群体公民的政治态度和效力的影响。在这样做的过程中,该项目代表了对宪法公民投票对政治态度的影响的独特审查,以及对关于公众支持一般少数群体权利,特别是土著权利的现有文献的重要扩展。此外,本研究的结果将有助于深入了解宪法改革对少数民族公民对政治制度的依恋和信任的影响。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估而被认为值得支持。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Jay Krehbiel其他文献

The politics of panel systems: political insurance and the organization of high courts
  • DOI:
    10.1057/s41304-022-00379-5
  • 发表时间:
    2022-04-15
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    1.900
  • 作者:
    Jay Krehbiel
  • 通讯作者:
    Jay Krehbiel

Jay Krehbiel的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Jay Krehbiel', 18)}}的其他基金

RAPID: The Dynamics of Minority Support for the Supreme Court.
RAPID:少数派对最高法院支持的动态。
  • 批准号:
    2315950
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
RAPID: Collaborative Research: COVID-19, Crises, and Support for the Rule of Law
RAPID:合作研究:COVID-19、危机和对法治的支持
  • 批准号:
    2027653
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant

相似海外基金

Constitutional change in authoritarian regimes: the case of Myanmar
独裁政权的宪法变革:缅甸的案例
  • 批准号:
    DP180100772
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Projects
The study of constitutional cases reflecting social change and its theoretical ground
反映社会变迁的宪法案例研究及其理论基础
  • 批准号:
    16K03300
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Powers and Policy Levers: Constitutional Change and Devolution in Wales
权力和政策杠杆:威尔士的宪法变革和权力下放
  • 批准号:
    ES/N00745X/1
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Differences in mass and elite attitudes to the constitutional change process after the Scottish referendum and before the 2015 Westminster elections
苏格兰公投后和 2015 年威斯敏斯特选举前,大众和精英对宪法变革进程的态度差异
  • 批准号:
    ES/M010856/1
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Security in Scotland, with or without constitutional change
苏格兰的安全,无论是否修改宪法
  • 批准号:
    ES/L00139X/1
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Fiscal Aspects of Constitutional Change
宪法变革的财政方面
  • 批准号:
    ES/K007173/1
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Fairer, caring nations? The governance of care policy, constitutional change and addressing inequalities - lessons for Scotland - INVITED RESUBMISSION
更公平、更有爱心的国家?
  • 批准号:
    ES/K01093X/1
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Conversations on the Political Economy of Constitutional Change in Scotland
苏格兰宪法变革的政治经济学对话
  • 批准号:
    ES/J010685/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
How does the rise of constitutionalism change the constitutional theory?
宪政主义的兴起如何改变宪政理论?
  • 批准号:
    22530031
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Reframing Rights: Constitutional Implications of Technological Change
重构权利:技术变革的宪法含义
  • 批准号:
    9906834
  • 财政年份:
    1999
  • 资助金额:
    $ 5.15万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了