Transnationalization and the judicialization of welfare

跨国化与福利司法化

基本信息

项目摘要

TransJudFare deals with two challenges for welfare states in the European Union (EU): the transnationalization of citizenship and welfare rights and the judicialization of politics. European case law significantly broadens the eligibility of non-economically active EU nationals to non-contributory welfare services. Yet while these rights and their potential are widely discussed, there has been no systematic study of their actual impact on member states welfare states, the gap that this project aims to fill. TransJudFare focuses on social assistance measures and study grants and asks how member states respond to European case law at the level of lower courts, the administration, and the legislature. Teams of political scientists and lawyers in four member states will map changes in five western EU member states according to a unified approach, joining forces in the analyses along different dimensions. Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK are chosen as they are all targeted by migration flows but differ in important respects such as welfare state type and judicial system. By mapping and explaining reactions to case law, TransJudFare will enrich the political science literature on Europeanization, and law scholars analyses of the workings of the integrated European court system. It will give a systematic account of the relevance of judicialization and EU citizenship rights for member states welfare state reforms. TransJudFare cuts across several core themes outlined in the Welfare State Futures call, addressing the question of social citizenship, increased heterogeneity among EU member states, the new politics of the welfare state, and potential shifts of welfare responsibility to the European level.
TransJudFare 应对欧盟 (EU) 福利国家面临的两大挑战:公民和福利权利的跨国化以及政治的司法化。欧洲判例法极大地扩大了非经济活动欧盟国民获得非缴费型福利服务的资格。然而,尽管这些权利及其潜力得到了广泛讨论,但尚未系统研究它们对成员国福利国家的实际影响,而该项目旨在填补这一空白。 TransJudFare 重点关注社会援助措施和学习补助金,并询问成员国如何在下级法院、行政部门和立法机构层面应对欧洲判例法。四个成员国的政治学家和律师团队将按照统一的方法绘制西欧五个成员国的变化图,从不同维度联手进行分析。选择奥地利、丹麦、德国、荷兰和英国是因为它们都是移民流动的目标,但在福利国家类型和司法制度等重要方面有所不同。通过绘制和解释对判例法的反应,TransJudFare 将丰富有关欧洲化的政治学文献,以及法学者对一体化欧洲法院系统运作的分析。它将系统地阐述司法化和欧盟公民权利与成员国福利国家改革的相关性。 TransJudFare 跨越了福利国家未来呼吁中概述的几个核心主题,解决了社会公民问题、欧盟成员国之间日益增加的异质性、福利国家的新政治以及福利责任向欧洲层面的潜在转移。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(5)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Free movement and equal treatment in an unequal union
不平等联盟中的自由流动和平等待遇
  • DOI:
    10.1080/13501763.2018.1488887
  • 发表时间:
    2018
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    4.2
  • 作者:
    Susanne K. Schmidt;Michael Blauberger;Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen (ed.)
  • 通讯作者:
    Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen (ed.)
Brexit and the Free Movement of Workers: A Plea for National Legal Self-Assertiveness
英国脱欧和工人的自由流动:呼吁国家法律自信
  • DOI:
    10.2139/ssrn.2847013
  • 发表时间:
    2016
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Davies;Gareth T.
  • 通讯作者:
    Gareth T.
The fiscal impact of EU immigration on the tax-financed welfare state: Testing the ‘welfare burden’ thesis
欧盟移民对税收资助福利国家的财政影响:检验“福利负担”理论
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2017
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.3
  • 作者:
    Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen;Gabriel Pons Rotger
  • 通讯作者:
    Gabriel Pons Rotger
ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence
  • DOI:
    10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880
  • 发表时间:
    2018-01-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    4.2
  • 作者:
    Blauberger, Michael;Heindlmaier, Anita;Werner, Benjamin
  • 通讯作者:
    Werner, Benjamin
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Professorin Dr. Susanne K. Schmidt其他文献

Professorin Dr. Susanne K. Schmidt的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Professorin Dr. Susanne K. Schmidt', 18)}}的其他基金

Rebalancing the Enlarged Single Market
重新平衡扩大的单一市场
  • 批准号:
    412341949
  • 财政年份:
    2019
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grants

相似海外基金

"Liberalization" of European Democracies in 1970s: Individualizaion, Rights Revolution and Judicialization?
20世纪70年代欧洲民主的“自由化”:个体化、权利革命和司法化?
  • 批准号:
    18H00820
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Testing the Social Construction of Rights and Media Coverage in an Age of Judicialization
检验司法化时代权利和媒体报道的社会建构
  • 批准号:
    1655281
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
State constitutional courts and judicialization of politics in the German Länder
德国国家宪法法院与政治司法化
  • 批准号:
    397123419
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grants
Democratization and Judicialization of Politics in Southeast Asian Countries
东南亚国家政治民主化和司法化
  • 批准号:
    26283005
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
The Judicialization of Climate Change Politics: A Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada
气候变化政治的司法化:英国、美国和加拿大的比较分析
  • 批准号:
    ES/K008153/1
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    --
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了