Antikes Ugarit und antikes Israel: Sphärenwechsel der Macht im ugaritischen Baal-Yamm-Mot-Zyklus und in hebräischen Yhwh-Königund Königs-Psalmen

乌加里特关于Baal， Yamm和Mot神的神话循环以及希伯来圣经中受神话启发的诗篇都记录了一种世界观，将世界的危险和保存与特定的王权概念紧密联系在一起。在乌加里特，城市王权和神圣君主之间的联系具有重要意义，随着权力范围的转移，世界的危险和保存正在经历配置。因此，神话周期的中心是一场决定性的但从未确定的王权之战，在天气之神巴力、混乱之神亚姆和下界之神莫特之间展开。权力的持续变化以几种不同的形式出现，解释各不相同，也不一致，所有这些形式都试图调和世俗的威胁和维护，并明显倾向于后者。只有对神话循环的地层学分析，以及随后对其各种主题和主题的识别和排序，才能阐明这些复杂的维度和过程。王朝王权和神圣君主制的概念在整个诗篇背叛了乌加里特文本惊人的亲和力。由于伟大调解过程的中间环节仍然未知，对乌加里特语和希伯来语圣经的文本人工制品进行仔细和批判性的比较证明是必要的。然而，比较难度只会增加，因为关于国王和耶和华的诗篇代表了跨越近五千年的神学历史。在这些诗篇文本中，几乎没有任何权力的转移发生在敌对的神灵之间。相反，耶和华与他在大卫宝座上的王的关系传达了权力的变化：这些变化然后加强了耶和华在地球上的统治。在这方面，诗篇2和110篇具有特殊的意义。然而神圣的，天上的统治者在诗篇2章的加冕之日，在锡安“背负”着他的君王之子，在诗篇110篇中，耶和华允许他在地上的命令在他自己的右手统治，从而将神圣和君王的宝座搭配在一起。这种特殊形式的领域变化最终描绘了耶和华对世界潜在威胁的果断行动。从古代叙利亚的传统中得到的，诗篇110中的主题和主题需要重新评估，同时需要进行地层文本分析，但这项工作首先需要评估诗篇2-110选集中所有以耶和华和（或）国王为中心的文本，并且只对国王进行评估，此外，评估和随后对各种主题和主题进行排序。在乌加里特和以色列一样，我的主题概念化了贯穿文本的神学思想，以接受审查。

Ugarit's mythic cycle about the gods Baal, Yamm, and Mot and the Hebrew Bible's mythicallyinspired Psalter both document a worldview that firmly connects the world's peril and preservation with a specific conception of kingship. At Ugarit, the connection between city royalty and divine monarchy assumes a great significance, with peril to and preservation of the world undergoing configuration as a shift among spheres of power. Thus, the myth cycle centers on a decisive but never decided battle for kingship between the weather god Baal, the chaos god Yamm, and the nether god Mot. Variously and inconsistently explained, the continued change in power appears in several different forms, all attempting to reconcile worldly threat and maintenance - with a marked preference for the latter. Only stratigraphic analysis of the mythic cycle and a subsequent identification and sequencing of its diverse mythemes and motifs can illuminate these complex dimensions and processes.Conceptions of dynastic kingship and divine monarchy throughout the Psalter betray striking affinities to the Ugaritic texts. Since the intervening links of the great mediation process still remain unknown, a careful and critical comparison of the textual artifacts from Ugarit and the Hebrew Bible proves essential. However, comparative difficulty only increases since the psalms about the king and Yhwh as the king represent a theological history that spans over almost half a millennium. Within these psalmic texts, hardly any shift in power takes place between rival numinous beings. Instead, the relationship of Yhwh to his king on the throne of David conveys the shifts in power: these changes then enforce Yhwh's rule upon the earth. Psalms 2 and 110 hold a special significance in this regard. Whereas the divine, heavenly ruler "bears" his kingly son on Zion upon the day of his coronation in Ps 2, in Ps 110 Yhwh allows his mandatary on earth to reign at his own right hand, thus collocating divine and kingly thrones. This particular form of changes in domain ultimately portrays Yhwh's decisive action against potential threats to the world. Received from ancient Syrian tradition, the mythemes and motifs in Ps 110 require renewed evaluation alongside stratigraphic textual analysis, but this undertaking first demands an assessment of all texts that center on Yhwh and(/as) king and on the king alone within the anthology of Ps 2-110 and, furthermore, an evaluation and subsequent sequencing of their various mythemes and motifs. In Ugarit and Israel alike, mythemes conceptualize the theological thought that prevails throughout the texts to undergo scrutiny.