权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Narratives of Foreignness and Belonging: Migration as a Discursive Process in Western European Border Regions (1815-1871)

外来性与归属感的叙述：作为西欧边境地区话语过程的移民（1815-1871）

基本信息

批准号：
290461930
负责人：
Professorin Dr. Levke Harders
金额：
--
依托单位：
Center Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung Innsbruck
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2015-12-31 至 2021-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/290461930?language=en
关键词：
Narratives Foreignness Belonging Migration Discursive

项目摘要

Migration was already a common component of society in the early 19th century, but it was only with the concept of the nation-state that it came to be perceived as a significant challenge. The project thus takes a fresh look at inner-European migration between 1815 und 1871, how it was regulated, at exclusion and inclusion and the actorsinvolved in these processes. It conceives of the production of alterity and belonging as a process in order to explore the homogenization and modernization of society as well as nation-building. To this end, the study undertakes a contrasting analysis of state practices surrounding migration as well as the motivations and behaviors of mobile people. With a regional focus on Alsace, Schleswig and Holstein, the study emphasizes the diversity of actors in Migration processes on the one hand and the particular significance of border regions on the other. The project combines two axes of investigation: The first enquires into the categories of social difference in migration processes. Methodologically and theoretically, the study applies an intersectional perspective to the interactions among various categories of social inequality: alterity, gender and education. The second axis of investigation links the analysis of discourses, Regimes and actors: an analysis of foreignness/belonging as a central distinction in European societies is followed by an exploration of the administration of migration and of the motivations and behaviors of mobile people. The distinction between foreign/not foreign structured discourses and regimes alike. The increasing mobility of people alsomobilized norms and practices, as is shown for the border regions of Schleswig, Holstein and Alsace, which I understand both as political-administrative territories and transnational social spaces. These case studies permit us to draw conclusions about the relationships among region, state and nation, not least because the regions studiedexperienced momentous political changes. Petitions for the right to settle, documents on the treatment of foreigners are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. These state sources are supplemented by contemporary accounts and ego-documents; in order to explore the actor perspective, the project will also investigate migrant life stories through collective biography. The project opens up various levels for evaluating migration and tackles key gaps in the literature: First, through its combination of meso- and micro-levels, it expands existing lines of enquiry into social and regional history within migration studies. Second, taking up transnational approaches, it systematically elaborates regional logics and documents them with concrete case studies. Third, with a focus on the negotiation of categories of difference, it contributes to current debates on the production of social inequalities. Finally, with its innovative theoretical and methodological framework, it broadens migration studies.

在世纪早期，移民已经是社会的一个常见组成部分，但只有在民族国家的概念下，移民才被视为一个重大挑战。因此，该项目重新审视了1815年至1871年间的欧洲内部移民、移民如何受到监管、排斥和包容以及参与这些过程的行为者。它将异质性和归属感的产生视为一个过程，以探索社会的同质化和现代化以及国家的建设。为此，本研究对各国围绕移徙的做法以及移动的人的动机和行为进行了对比分析。本研究以阿尔萨斯、石勒苏益格和荷尔斯泰因为区域重点，一方面强调移民过程中行为者的多样性，另一方面强调边境地区的特殊意义。该项目结合了两个调查轴：第一个询问到移民过程中的社会差异的类别。在方法论和理论上，本研究采用交叉视角来研究不同类别的社会不平等之间的相互作用：异性、性别和教育。调查的第二个轴连接话语，政权和演员的分析：分析的外国性/归属感作为一个中心的区别在欧洲社会的移民管理和移动的人的动机和行为的探索。外国/非外国结构化话语和制度之间的区别。人口流动性的增加也使规范和做法变得更加流动，例如石勒苏益格、荷尔斯泰因和阿尔萨斯的边境地区，我认为这些地区既是政治行政领土，也是跨国社会空间。这些案例研究使我们能够对地区、国家和民族之间的关系得出结论，尤其是因为所研究的地区经历了重大的政治变革。对定居权的请愿书，关于外国人待遇的文件进行了定量和定性分析。这些国家的来源是由当代帐户和自我文件的补充;为了探索演员的角度来看，该项目还将通过集体传记调查移民生活的故事。该项目为评估移徙开辟了各个层面，并填补了文献中的主要空白：首先，通过结合中观和微观层面，它扩大了移徙研究中社会和区域历史的现有调查范围。第二，采用跨国方法，系统阐述区域逻辑，并以具体案例研究记录这些逻辑。第三，它侧重于谈判差异的类别，有助于目前关于社会不平等产生的辩论。最后，它以其创新的理论和方法框架，拓宽了移徙研究。