A dynamic view on trust: Development and consequences of trust in teams

对信任的动态看法：团队信任的发展和后果

• 批准号: 335748286
• 负责人: Professorin Dr. Isabell Welpe
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Darla Moore School of Business
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2019-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/335748286?language=en
• 关键词: dynamic; view; trust; Development; consequences

The current proposal strives to examine the development of trust in teams and team dynamics. The data collected for a former DFG-project provide the unforeseen opportunity to examine team development from foundation until disbandment. Log-file data can be used to create proxies for psychologically meaningful constructs and examine dynamic relationships over time (Drescher et al., 2014; Drescher et al., 2011; Korsgaard et al., 2014), which have, however, to be validated with psychometric measures from surveys (Drescher et al., 2014).In the current proposal, we plan to validate these log-file proxies in order to analyze the following, so far unaddressed research questions:1. What are the dynamic relationships among antecedents of trust, trust, and consequences of trust in teams over time?2. Which factors influence the dynamic interplay between antecedents of trust, trust, and consequences of trust in teams?In specific, we plan to assess the curvilinear relationship between trustworthiness facets (ability, benevolence, integrity) and trust over time, i.e., the relative importance of each of the trustworthiness facets over the group life-cycle. Moreover, we plan to address factors moderating the relationship between shared leadership and the development of trust, e.g., the stability of the environment. In addition, we want to examine the temporal relationship between trust and both performance and turnover as well as contextual variables (such as stability of the environment and trust asymmetry) moderating this relationship.Examining these temporal dynamics is of crucial importance as trust is usually defined as an emergent construct that develops over time (de Jong & Elfring, 2010), however it is only rarely analyzed in a dynamic way (Lewicki, 2006; Pitariu & Ployhart, 2010). The studies outlined in our proposal therefore contribute to the literature on the development of trust and team dynamics.

当前的建议努力检查团队信任和团队动力的发展。为以前的dfg项目收集的数据提供了一个不可预见的机会来检查团队从建立到解散的发展情况。日志文件数据可用于为心理上有意义的结构创建代理，并检查随时间变化的动态关系（Drescher et al., 2014; Drescher et al., 2011; Korsgaard et al., 2014），然而，这需要通过调查中的心理测量测量来验证（Drescher et al., 2014）。在目前的提案中，我们计划验证这些日志文件代理，以分析以下，到目前为止尚未解决的研究问题：随着时间的推移，团队中信任的前因、信任和信任的结果之间的动态关系是什么？哪些因素影响团队中信任的前因、信任和信任的结果之间的动态相互作用？具体而言，我们计划评估可信度方面（能力、仁慈、正直）与信任之间随时间的曲线关系，即每个可信度方面在群体生命周期中的相对重要性。此外，我们计划解决调节共享领导与信任发展之间关系的因素，例如环境的稳定性。此外，我们想研究信任与绩效和离职之间的时间关系，以及调节这种关系的上下文变量（如环境的稳定性和信任不对称）。检查这些时间动态是至关重要的，因为信任通常被定义为随着时间的推移而发展的紧急结构（de Jong & Elfring, 2010），但很少以动态的方式进行分析（Lewicki, 2006; Pitariu & Ployhart, 2010）。因此，我们建议中概述的研究有助于发展信任和团队动力的文献。