权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Spatial planning and locational decision-making for public housing interventions in South Africa (resubmission)

南非公共住房干预措施的空间规划和区位决策（重新提交）

基本信息

批准号：
353020866
负责人：
Professor Dr.-Ing. Uwe Altrock
金额：
--
依托单位：
Fachgebiet Stadterneuerung und Stadtumbau
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2016-12-31 至 2022-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/353020866?language=en
关键词：
Spatial planning locational decision making

项目摘要

For many years, South African municipalities had to live with legaluncertainties about planning competencies and an overlay of planninglaws, which promoted different rules and institutions. Municipalitiesare faced with a huge demand for low-income housing by peopleliving in informal settlements. At the same time higher levels ofgovernment exert pressure to implement housing programmes whichdo not always match local priorities. Against this backdrop, the studywants to increase academic knowledge about the actors (inside andoutside of government), who are involved in the governance of landand housing, and about the (formal and informal) rules andinstitutions, which are invoked in the process. It will establish to whatdegree locational decisions are guided by legally required planninginstruments like spatial development frameworks and "housingchapters". Analytical governance concepts will be used to explain bothstructural and cultural factors behind concrete planning practices.Case studies from different provinces covering both informalsettlement upgrading and new housing development are expected tocontribute to comparative research into spatial planning systems. Bylinking governance and performance analyses of planning practice thestudy will also add to the international debate about appropriateapproaches to spatial planning in emerging economies, which arecharacterized by huge economic disparity and cultural difference.

多年来，南非的市政当局不得不忍受规划权限的法律不确定性和规划法律的重叠，这促进了不同的规则和机构。城市面临着居住在非正规住区的人们对低收入住房的巨大需求。与此同时，更高级别的政府施加压力，实施住房计划，这些计划并不总是与当地的优先事项相匹配。在此背景下，本研究希望增加有关参与土地和住房治理的行为者（政府内外）以及在此过程中引用的（正式和非正式）规则和制度的学术知识。它将确定选址决策在多大程度上受到法律要求的规划工具（如空间发展框架和“住房章节”）的指导。分析性的治理概念将被用来解释具体规划实践背后的结构和文化因素。来自不同省份的案例研究涵盖了非正式住区升级和新住房开发，预计将有助于空间规划系统的比较研究。通过将规划实践的治理和绩效分析联系起来，这项研究还将增加关于新兴经济体空间规划适当方法的国际辩论，这些经济体的特点是巨大的经济差距和文化差异。