Political Participation in the Province - Notables in Liberal France and Conservative Prussia (1815-1840)

该省的政治参与 - 自由派法国和保守派普鲁士的名人（1815-1840）

• 批准号: 388158513
• 负责人: Professorin Dr. Gabriele B. Clemens
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Neuere Geschichte und Landesgeschichte
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2020-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/388158513?language=en
• 关键词: Political; Participation; Province; Notables; Liberal

The sub-project will pursue the goal of comparing the political participation of notables of the Rhine Province, which was based on social and economic inequality, to participation in the three French Departments in the Southeast of France (Saône et Loire, Loire and Rhône). The sub-project will break new ground not only because of this comparative perspective. The so called period of restauration has attracted much less attention by German and French research than the troubles caused by the Revolution. The sub-project will research ways of the political participation of the elites in mid-level state institutions: In France this refers to the General Councils of the Departments, the leading personnel of the prefectures and the maires of the big cities. In Prussia this refers to the deputies of the Provincial Assembly of the Estates as well as to the leading personnel of the provincial government with the district presidents, the district administrators and the mayors. Concerning both regions, also the political behaviour of the actors of societies, academies, chambers of commerce and municipal councils will be included. The sub-project starts out from observations on the history of administration. According to these, when it came to actual administrative proceedings, the leeway of administrations was considerably determined by the interests and behaviour of the respective local actors. In a comparative way it will be analysed how political participation, issues of economic development as well as the social question were made a topic of discussion and politically-administratively dealt with in this context. In terms of methods, approaches of the history of political ideas (discourse analysis) and of social history (network analysis) will be combined, to this way take those actors into account who, based on the given social situation, formulated their claims to participation. On the one hand claims to political participation and independence from the conservative governments and, on the other hand, the problem of the different dimensions of economic and socio-cultural inequality (status) and, last but not least, of class inequality in times of restauration will be analysed. Thus, what will be researched is the interaction of political participation and the various dimensions of inequality, on the one hand within the group of actors (controversies between nobility and bourgeoisie) and on the other hand in view of the politically excluded middle and lower classes. The sub-project will deal with four dimensions of inequality: firstly, social and economic inequality, secondly legal (suffrage) and status-related differences (re-privileging of the nobility), thirdly the obviously disparate ways of representation as well as, fourthly, the refusal of democratic norms of equality. What will be taken into account is the evident connection of participation and inequality which clearly indicates the existence of relational and participation inequality.

该分项目的目标是比较莱茵省名人的政治参与情况，因为莱茵省的政治参与是建立在社会和经济不平等的基础上的，与法国东南部三个省（Saône et Loire， Loire和Rhône）的政治参与情况。子项目将开辟新的领域，不仅是因为这种比较视角。在德国和法国的研究中，所谓的复兴时期所引起的关注远远不及大革命所造成的麻烦。该子项目将研究中层国家机构精英的政治参与方式：在法国，这是指部门总委员会，州的领导人员和大城市的市长。在普鲁士，这指的是省三级议会的代表，以及省政府的领导人员，包括区主席、区行政长官和市长。关于这两个区域，还将包括社会、学院、商会和市政委员会行动者的政治行为。子项目从对行政管理历史的观察开始。根据这些意见，当涉及到实际的行政诉讼时，行政当局的回旋余地在很大程度上取决于各自地方行动者的利益和行为。将以比较的方式分析政治参与、经济发展问题以及社会问题如何成为讨论的主题，并在这方面从政治行政上加以处理。在方法方面，将结合政治思想史（话语分析）和社会史（网络分析）的方法，以这种方式考虑到那些基于给定社会情境制定其参与要求的行动者。一方面要求政治参与和独立于保守政府，另一方面，将分析经济和社会文化不平等（地位）的不同方面的问题，最后但并非最不重要的是，在恢复时期的阶级不平等。因此，要研究的是政治参与和不平等的各个方面的相互作用，一方面是在演员群体内部（贵族和资产阶级之间的争议），另一方面是考虑到政治上被排斥的中下层阶级。子项目将涉及不平等的四个维度：第一，社会和经济不平等；第二，法律（选举权）和与地位相关的差异（贵族的重新特权）；第三，明显不同的代表方式；第四，对平等的民主规范的拒绝。要考虑的是参与和不平等之间的明显联系，这清楚地表明关系不平等和参与不平等的存在。