Exit Strategy of UN Peacekeeping Operations and the Effects on Sustainable Peace

虽然现有的研究忽略了冲突管理工作之间的相互依存关系，但需要了解多个特派团，以促进对和平行动的全面了解。为了研究联合国维和行动的退出战略，首先，今年的研究调查了为什么联合国维和行动（UN PKOs）被联合国政治特派团（UN PMs）取代。在理论论证的基础上，本文使用1993年至2016年在内战后国家部署联合国维和行动和联合国维和部队的数据对假设进行了检验。本文提供的条件下，更换可能是兼容的东道国的需求，以及联合国的作用，以服务于公共产品，同时最大限度地减少联合国维和行动的供应方的政治冲突的影响。

While consideration of interdependencies among conflict management efforts have been overlooked in the extant research, understanding multiple missions is required to promote a holistic understanding of peace operations. To examine the exit strategy of UN PKO, first, this year’s research investigated why UN Peacekeeping Operations (UN PKOs) are replaced by UN Political Missions (UN PMs). Based on the theoretical arguments, the paper tested hypotheses using data on the deployment of UN PKOs and UN PMs in post-civil war countries between 1993 and 2016. The paper provides implications about conditions under which the replacement may be compatible with demand of host state as well as the role of UN to serve public goods while minimizing political conflicts within the supply side of UN PKO.