Summa cum fraude – Scientific Misconduct and the Attempt of a Counterattack

Summa cumfrase â科学不端行为和反击的尝试

• 批准号: 430681129
• 负责人: Dr. Ulrich Herb
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Saarländische Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Science Communication, Research Data, eResearch (Scientific Library Services and Information Systems)
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2018-12-31 至 2022-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/430681129?language=en
• 关键词: Summa; cum; fraude; Scientific; Misconduct

The project "Summa cum fraude – Scientific Misconduct and the Attempt of a Counterattack" is intended to provide an active tool for self-regulation in science in order to engage the strongly expanding phenomenon of scientific misconduct. Basically, the project entails a targeted search of publications in scientific journals (here: physics, chemistry and material science) in order to find studies with fabricated or false data. After reporting these cases to the editors of the concerned journals the whole process of investigation is documented. Primarily, the project therefore aims to eliminate such publications that are in strong conflict with the standards of good scientific practice in order to avoid that fake science contributes to the current knowledge. Based on these investigations, new and especially uniform and standardized concepts to cope with scientific misconduct are discussed with representatives from several publishers and libraries, and ombudspeople (e.g. at a concluding workshop). The knowledge of the fundamental mechanisms of scientific misconduct and the analysis of typical systematics (i.e. topic of the journal, open access journal, publisher, impact factor, type of misconduct, repeated misconduct, statement by the authors, duration of the investigation by the journal, final decision by the editor) may provide possible solutions to prevent scientific misconduct or to reduce its current extent.

“欺诈行为之最-科学不端行为和反击企图”项目旨在为科学界的自我监管提供一个积极的工具，以遏制日益严重的科学不端行为现象。基本上，该项目需要有针对性地搜索科学期刊上的出版物（这里是：物理学，化学和材料科学），以找到伪造或虚假数据的研究。在将这些案件报告给有关期刊的编辑之后，整个调查过程都被记录下来。因此，该项目旨在消除与良好科学实践标准强烈冲突的出版物，以避免虚假科学对现有知识的贡献。 在这些调查的基础上，与来自几个出版商和图书馆的代表以及监察员（例如，在最后的研讨会上）讨论了新的、特别是统一和标准化的概念，以科普科学不端行为。科学不端行为的基本机制的知识和典型的系统分析（即期刊的主题，开放获取期刊，出版商，影响因子，不端行为的类型，重复的不端行为，作者的声明，期刊调查的持续时间，编辑的最终决定）可以提供可能的解决方案，以防止科学不端行为或减少其目前的程度。