The Roman fortlet on the "Blöskopf" near Bad Ems - a contribution to early imperial occupation at the lower Lahn region

巴德埃姆斯附近“Blöskopf”上的罗马堡垒 - 对早期帝国占领拉恩下游地区的贡献

• 批准号: 431035150
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Markus Scholz
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Abteilung II: Archäologie, Geschichte d römischen Provinzen sowie Archäologie v Münze, Geld u v Wirtschaft i d Antike
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2018-12-31 至 2020-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/431035150?language=en
• 关键词: Roman; fortlet; Bl; skopf; near

The lower Lahn region and its significance for the Roman-Germanic relations in the early imperial period is conditioned by the Roman military camps near Lahnstein, Limburg, Oberbrechen and Dorlar as well as Waldgirmes, a city in statu nascendi. They are all dated to the late Republican up to late Augustean period. When in 2016 on the mountain spur "Ehrlich" above Bad Ems an timber-earth fort of approx. 8 acre size was discovered it seemed that another Augustan camp had been found. However, excavations carried out by the Goethe-University 2017-18 proved that it has to be dated between 40 and 70 AD.This discovery sheds new light on another well-known monument. For more than 100 years, the approx. 0.8 ha large site on the Blöskopf near Bad Ems confined by a rectangular ditch and wall system was considered to be a Roman blast furnace. Without concrete evidence, it was placed in the context of the nearby passing Upper German Limes and dated to the period around 200 AD. A sondage in 2008 and its examination refute this. Rather, it is a small fortlet-like complex, also from around 40-70 AD. This surprising insight raises questions. A pre-Flavian fortlet on the right bank of the Rhine is at present unprecedented. Unusual for this early period is also the existence of an interior building on stonewall foundations. Which function(s) did the camp have, which the stone construction in its interior? In this context it is also necessary to clarify the dating and function of an adjacent linear entrenchment (a ditch-wall-system) previously unknown, but now visible in the LiDAR scan, by which the Blöskopf pass was blocked to the east and thus also the access to the Lahn was controllable. Are these facilities related to Roman mining activities that have been demonstrated in the region and mentioned by Tacitus? What role did the large camp on the "Ehrlich" 1.5 km away play in this? Did both military sites fall victim to the same fate, as final layers of burned material seem to suggest?If the layout on the Blöskopf could be characterized more precisely, the previously unknown Claudian-Neronic occupation phase of the lower Lahn region could be better classified and interpreted. As a cooperation of the Goethe-University Frankfurt and the GDKE Koblenz, three targeted areas are to be excavated during a six-week campaign. Furthermore, geochemical pottery analysis points to previously unknown connections to military sites in the Rhine-Main area of the same period.

下拉恩地区及其对帝国早期罗马日耳曼关系的重要性，是由罗马军营附近的拉恩斯坦，林堡，奥伯布莱臣和多拉尔以及瓦尔德吉姆斯，一个地位新兴的城市。它们都可以追溯到共和党晚期到奥古斯都晚期。2016年，在巴德埃姆斯（Bad Ems）上方的“埃利希”（Ehrlich）山脚上，大约有一座木制的土堡。发现了8英亩的面积，似乎又发现了一个奥古斯都的营地。然而，由歌德大学2017-18进行的挖掘证明，它的年代必须在公元40年到70年之间。这一发现为另一个著名的纪念碑提供了新的线索。100多年来，大约。在Bad Ems附近的Blöskopf上0.8公顷的大场地被矩形沟渠和墙系统所限制，被认为是罗马高炉。在没有具体证据的情况下，它被置于附近经过的上德意志莱姆斯的背景下，可以追溯到公元200年左右。2008年的一艘船及其检查反驳了这一点。更确切地说，它是一个类似堡垒的小型建筑群，也建于公元40-70年左右。这种令人惊讶的见解引发了一些问题。在莱茵河右岸建立一座前弗拉维亚时期的堡垒，目前是前所未有的。在这个早期时期，不寻常的是还有一座内部建筑建在石墙基础上。营地有哪些功能，内部有哪些石头建筑？在这种情况下，也有必要澄清相邻的线性堑壕（沟墙系统）的年代和功能，以前未知，但现在在激光雷达扫描中可见，通过它，Blöskopf通道被阻挡在东部，因此也可以控制进入Lahn的通道。这些设施是否与塔西佗所提到的罗马采矿活动有关？1.5公里外的“埃利希”大营地在其中扮演了什么角色？这两处军事遗址是否像最后几层燃烧的材料所暗示的那样，遭遇了同样的命运？如果能更精确地描述Blöskopf上的布局，就可以更好地分类和解释以前未知的克劳狄-尼禄占领下拉恩地区的阶段。作为法兰克福歌德大学和GDKE科布伦茨的合作，三个目标区域将在为期六周的活动中进行挖掘。此外，地球化学陶器分析指出，在同一时期，莱茵-美因地区的军事遗址与以前未知的联系。