A study for 'Yokyoku', the Texts of 'Noh' plays, by the method of bibliography

1.我们在“乌泰本”的群体中认识到了文本历史的给定系统，拥有相同的松香。我们知道我们可以在“Utai-bon”群体中研究文本历史的系统，从可靠的集合中流传下来，并有合法的理由开始。我们认为对类似文本，即《所舍都论》和《元赖论》进行比较研究的重要性。我们制作了手稿“Utai-bon”的列表。5.我们列出了手稿“Utai-bon”中的版权页。6.我们开始的工作，以比较组的“Sosethu-bon”和组的“Motoyori-bon”。7.我们发现了相同印记的书籍之间的不同部分，“Syotoku-Yayoi-Utai-bon”。

1. We recognized the given systems of the textual history in the groups of 'Utai-bon', owned the same colophon.2. We knew we could research the systems of the textual history in the groups of 'Utai-bon', handed down from the reliable collections, and had legitimate reason for initiation.3. We thought of the importance to do the comparative research among the similar texts, the group of the 'Sosethu-bon' and the 'Motoyori-bon'.4. We maded the list of the manuscript 'Utai-bon'.5. We made the list of the colophon in the manuscript 'Utai-bon'.6. We began the work to compare the group of the 'Sosethu-bon' and the group of the 'Motoyori-bon'.7. We discovered the different part for printing between the books of the same imprint, the 'Syotoku-Yayoi-Utai-bon'.