What is philolgical self-evidence? Perspectives from literary criticism and jurisprudence

什么是语言学的自明性？

• 批准号: 438613222
• 负责人: Dr. Eva Noller
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Seminar für Klassische Philologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Scientific Networks
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2019-12-31 至 2023-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/438613222?language=en
• 关键词: What; philolgical; self; evidence; Perspectives

The DFG-network "What is philological self-evidence? Perspectives from literary criticism and jurisprudence" aims to make self-evidence – an aspect of literary and philological theory and practice that has not yet been sufficiently investigated – useful for the theoretical-methodological discourse of (textual) knowledge in the broader sense. The challenge of any concern with self-evidence lies in its ambiguity. Self-evidence, for example, can be under-stood as the product of a cognitive process, but also as a prerequisite for cognition and judgement; self-evidence has both rational and intuitive traits, it proves something, but at the same time is often itself not completely explainable in its obviousness. Although self-evidence is often called upon as a central instance in processes of knowledge and judgement, there is a lack of approaches that provide a theoretically and methodologically reflected definition of what constitutes self-evidence as a (non) hermeneutic concept and/or category. The DFG-network would like to bridge this gap and show how the concept of self-evidence can be made applicable to other interpretative sciences. Therefore, the project is interdisciplinary, but concentrates on disciplines dealing with the interpretation of texts: Classical Philology, German Studies, Law. The aim is to make similarities and differences in methods and ques-tions when dealing with texts more clearly comprehensible through the different disciplines participating and to be able to shed light on them from both a synchronic and a diachronic perspective. The work focuses on two aspects: 1) A conceptual definition of self-evidence, based on its origin in (ancient) rhetoric; 2) The investigation of self-evidence as a form of knowledge. From the contributions worked out by the individual members, self-evidence should be grasped more clearly not only in its problematics but also in its possibilities for interpretative analysis of texts.

DFG网络“什么是语言学的自证？《文学批评和法学的视角》旨在使自证--文学和语言学理论和实践的一个尚未得到充分研究的方面--在更广泛意义上对（文本）知识的理论方法论话语有用。任何对自我证据的关注的挑战都在于它的模糊性。例如，自证可以被理解为认知过程的产物，但也可以被理解为认知和判断的先决条件;自证既有理性的又有直觉的特征，它证明了某件事，但同时它本身往往也不是完全可以解释的。虽然自证常常被称为知识和判断过程中的一个中心实例，但缺乏提供理论和方法论上反映的自证作为（非）解释学概念和/或类别的定义的方法。DFG网络希望弥合这一差距，并展示如何将自证的概念应用于其他解释科学。因此，该项目是跨学科的，但集中在处理文本解释的学科：古典文献学，德国研究，法律。其目的是通过参与的不同学科更清晰地理解处理文本时方法和问题的相似性和差异，并能够从共时和历时的角度阐明它们。这项工作集中在两个方面：1）一个概念定义的自我证据，其基础上的起源（古代）修辞学; 2）调查的自我证据作为一种形式的知识。从个别成员所作的贡献中，应该更清楚地掌握自证性，不仅是在其问题方面，而且在其对文本进行解释性分析的可能性方面。