A study of Epicurus' fragments and doxographies on his philosophy

本研究的一个目的是弄清伊壁鸠鲁是否维护着两种神。首先，我利用伊壁鸠鲁本人、他的弟子和多克索拉弗的著作，考察了伊壁鸠鲁对第一种主要教义的论述与对西塞罗的描述之间的关系。然后，我猜测西塞罗略微扭曲了伊壁鸠鲁神学的意图，因为他权衡了神的结构的柔软性，强调了伊壁鸠鲁在一段经文中对伊壁鸠鲁神的强调。因此，我确定伊壁鸠鲁承认两种神，即，伊壁鸠鲁哲学的另一个目的是考察伊壁鸠鲁关于他的哲学的片断和手稿，并将其翻译成日文，作为eidola的起源和派生，尽管它们的实质是细小的原子。在这份报告中，描述了7-25节(Arright Etti)的译本以及《尤塞纳》和《Epicuro歌剧》中的片段与《Arright etti》片段的对比列表。

An aim of this study is to make clear whether or not Epicurus maintained two kinds of the gods.At first I examine a relationship between the statement of the scholiast on the first of Principal Doctrines and the description of Cicero' De natura deorum I especially, by utilizing the writings of Epicurus himself, his disciples and the doxoraphers.Then I guess that Cicero distorted slightly the intention of Epicurus' doctrine of the gods, because he weighted the softness of structure of gods and emphasized the eidola-gods in a passage of N.D.Consequently I determine that Epicurus admitted two kinds of the gods, that is, the incorruptible gods dwelling in 'intermundia' as the origin of eidola and the eidola-gods as the derivative from them, although their substance consists of fine atoms.Another aim of this study is to examine Epicurus' fragments and doxographies on his philosophy and to translate them into Japanese with commentaries. In this report the translations of Fr.7-25 (Arrighetti) and the list contrasting between the fragments in Usener, Epicurea and the fragments in Arrighetti, Epicuro Opere are described.