A RESEARCH NOTE ON THE MODERN HISTORY OF CRIMINAL LAW IN GERMANY.

德国现代刑法史研究报告。

• 批准号: 05802008
• 负责人: OKAMOTO Wasaru
• 金额: $ 0.38万
• 依托单位: TOHOKU-UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1993
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1993 至 1994
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05802008/
• 关键词: Criminal Code 1851 of Prussia's; Draft of Criminal Code of Prussia's; Common Law in Germany; Kamptz; Bode; プロイセンラント刑法典草案; ボ-デ; プロイセン形法; プロイセン普通ラント法; ダンケルマン; ザヴィニー

The age of common law in Germany, preceding the enactment of the Criminal Code 1872 of the German Empire's, was the age not only of animated discussions on the theory but also of fruitful attempts to legislate a criminal code in German states, for example 1813 in Bavaria, 1851 in Prussia ; considerable efforts to make out a draft of a modern criminal code and many turns and twists in Bavaria, one of the leading states in South Germany, in Prussia, one in North Germany, and in other states. It was the Criminal Code 1851 of Prussia's that had the most direct and profound effect on the Criminal Code 1872 of German Empire's of all the state's codes. It had the close relationship with the history that the national unity by Prussia effected North German Union and accelerated the attempts at a united criminal code. In this sense, it may fairly be said that it was most direct and profpund that the Criminal Code 1872 of German Empire's, and that there were very few practical differences between them. This is why the legislative process of the Criminal Code 1851 of Prussia's has to be researched and examined positively as well as accurately in order to understand and think deeply of the real meaning of the Criminal Code 1872 of German Empire's, regarded as the root of our Criminal Code, and the theory of criminal law in Germany. The reforming period of Prussia's criminal code is often divided into the 1st Period, the 2nd Period and the latest Period. In the 1st Period, Danckelmann, the Minister of Justice, founded the reforming and the draft (of 1833 and 1836) colored by Kamptz was made out at his dictation. On the contrary, in 2nd Period, the Privy Council had got jurisdiction on the reforming. After deep deliberation at the subcommittees and the general meeting under the Privy Council, in 1840 the draft of the direct committee's and then in 1843 that of the Privy Council's was made out. Each period is found a law unto itself.

在德意志帝国1872年颁布《刑法》之前的德国普通法时代，不仅是对刑法理论进行热烈讨论的时代，而且是在德意志各州（例如1813年在巴伐利亚，1851年在普鲁士）进行卓有成效的刑法立法尝试的时代；在巴伐利亚州，德国南部的主要州之一，在普鲁士，在德国北部的一个州，以及其他州，制定一部现代刑法草案付出了巨大的努力，经历了许多曲折。1851年普鲁士的《刑法》对德意志帝国1872年的《刑法》的影响最为直接和深远。普鲁士的民族统一影响了北德意志联盟，加速了统一刑法的尝试，这与历史有着密切的关系。从这个意义上说，可以说德意志帝国1872年的《刑法》是最直接和最深刻的，两者在实践上几乎没有什么不同。因此，必须对1851年普鲁士刑法典的立法过程进行积极而准确的研究和考察，以深刻理解和思考作为我国刑法典之根的德意志帝国1872年刑法典的真正意义，以及德国的刑法理论。普鲁士刑法的改革通常分为第一阶段、第二阶段和最新阶段。在第一时期，司法部长丹克尔曼创立了改革运动，由坎普茨着色的草案（1833年和1836年）是在他的口授下起草的。相反，在第二时期，枢密院获得了改革的管辖权。经过枢密院下属各小组委员会和全体会议的深入审议，1840年和1843年分别制定了直接委员会的草案和枢密院的草案。每个时期都有自己的规律。

项目成果

岡本勝: "放火罪と「公共の危険」(三)" 法学(東北大学法学部紀要). 57. 541-564 (1993)

Masaru Okamoto：“纵火和‘公共危险’（第 3 部分）”法（东北大学法学院公告）57. 541-564 (1993)。