权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Conversion of East-Asian law-making bases for Economic Laws: Comparative Study on Korea and Japan Economic Laws

东亚经济法立法基础的转换：韩日经济法比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
15203002
负责人：
HIENUKI Toshifumi
金额：
$ 20.63万
依托单位：
Hokkaido University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15203002/
关键词：
Industrial Structure Reform Principle of Market Oriented Policy Despotism or Autocratic for Economic Development Korean large conglomerates Bureaucrat-Made Cartel Free Trade Agreements Industrial Policy Economic Laws WTOのTRIPs協定競争原理と開発原

项目摘要

Facing at the extraordinary economic growth of China, Japanese government and Korean government make Industrial Structure Coordination that seem to be getting out from bureaucrat-initiated economic policy laws, and getting into the America way of market oriented policy laws. Korean government seemed to think that economic domination of Korean large conglomerates(Chaebols) are ultimate cause of currency crisis in 1997. To regulate the Chaebols domination is now main target of Korean Industrial Structure Coordination. Korean Fair Trade Commission tried to change the Korean large conglomerates(Chaebols) to the more transparent holding-company.Japanese economic policy is also going into the great change. The bureaucrat-initiated economic policy in Japan are now changed from the discretionary-based, and the administrative pre-regulations, to rule-oriented and judiciary-like post-regulations. Japanese Fair Trade Commission and the Japanese Prosecute threw the book of rules at many white-colored economic crimes like Bureaucrat-Made Cartels ; "Kansei-Dangou". The courts also acutely penalize the stock-exchange laws offenders like "Horiemon" in Live-Door Case.It became very clear today that the old basements of economic-law-makers are changed and conventional industrial policies in Japanese government and Korean government are almost disappeared. If this new trends does not mean disappear of economic laws in themselves, challenges are making new platform of market oriented economic laws. These trends begin just now. No-one can tell anything about the future of Industrial Structure Coordination. But Industrial Structure Coordination of both countries will make new East-Asian platform of market oriented economic laws, even in the different ways.

面对中国经济的超常规增长，日本和韩国政府的产业结构协调似乎正在走出官僚主导型的经济政策法，进入美国式的市场导向型政策法。韩国政府似乎认为韩国大企业集团的经济支配地位是1997年货币危机的根本原因。调整财阀统治是韩国产业结构调整的主要目标。韩国公平交易委员会试图将韩国的大企业集团（财阀）转变为更加透明的控股公司，日本的经济政策也正在发生巨大的变化。日本官僚主导的经济政策由自由裁量型、行政型的事前规制向规则型、司法型的事后规制转变。日本公平交易委员会和日本检察官对官僚卡特尔、“关西流氓”等白色经济犯罪进行了严厉打击。法院也严厉惩罚了证券交易法的违法者，如Live-Door案中的“Horiemon”。今天，日本政府和韩国政府的传统产业政策几乎消失，经济法制定者的旧地下室已经改变。如果说这一新趋势并不意味着经济规律本身的消失，那么挑战就是为市场导向的经济规律搭建新的平台。这些趋势开始。产业结构协调的前景如何，谁也说不准。但两国产业结构的协调将使东亚成为市场经济规律的新平台，甚至是以不同的方式。