权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comprehensive Study on the Daichidoron : Its Origin and Influence on Chinese Buddhism

大千佛论综合研究:其渊源及其对中国佛教的影响

基本信息

批准号：
11410006
负责人：
KATO Junsho
金额：
$ 9.41万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1. Kato has found brief but complete quotations of the『十住』、the『百論』、and the『弥勒』etc, which are also translated by Kumirajiva in the Daichidoron. By investigating how Kumarajiva's translations are quoted in the Daichidoron, it will become clear to what extent he is concerned with this text. It is also sure that only by the investigation of the quotations in the Daichidoron., we can nat survey its author problem.2. Takeda claims that it is necessary for this problem to clarify what is the genuine theme of the Daichidoron.3. Saito has discussed differences between the Daichidoron and the Mula-madhyamaka-karika.4. Wada has more deeply clarified the Vaisesika thought presented by the Padlctha-dharma samgraha. This clarification helps to understand the Daichidoron.5. By comparing the Daichidoron and the Sutras belonging to the Maitreya Group and by illustrating the figures of the Maitreya found in Central Asia, Miyaji has claimed that the Maitreya cult prevailed in various places through the Silk Road in the period.6. By using the Zoku-kosoden (『続高僧伝』), Ohno has proved that the Daichidoron was studied extensively in the period of Sui and early Tang that Kichizo (吉藏) of the Sanron (三論) School criticized the Daichidoron from a political point of view even though he often utilized this text, and that great influence of the Daichidoron eventually bore fruit in the Samadhi system of Tendai-Chigi (天台智〓). We have not arrived at the conclusive view of the author problem of the Daichidoron, but we believe that we have made an important step forward in our research on this text.

1.加藤发现了《十住“、The百論”、》和《弥勒》等的简短而完整的引文，这些引文也是由Kumirajiva在《Daichidoron》翻译的。通过调查Kumarajiva的翻译是如何在《Daichidoron》中被引用的，就会很清楚他对这篇文章的关注程度。也可以肯定的是，只有对《大千道观》中的语录进行考察，才能考察其作者问题。武田声称，这个问题有必要澄清什么是真正的主题的第一道道。斋藤讨论了Daichidoron和Mula-madhyamaka-karik.4之间的区别。世界反兴奋剂机构更深入地阐明了法身法三摩所提出的Vaisesika思想。这一澄清有助于理解大池塘。通过比较弥勒集团的《大千道龙》和《弥勒经》，并举例说明在中亚发现的弥勒人物，宫廷认为弥勒邪教通过丝绸之路在当时的各个地方盛行。通过使用Zoku-kosoden(“続高僧伝”)，Ohno证明了Daichidoron在隋朝和初唐时期得到了广泛的研究，三龙(吉藏)学派的Kichizo(三論)从政治角度对Daichidoron进行了批评，尽管他经常使用这一文本，并且Daichidoron的巨大影响最终在天台-赤木(天台智〓)的三摩地系统中结出了果实。我们对《大千道龙》的作者问题还没有得出定论，但我们相信，我们在这篇文章的研究上已经向前迈出了重要的一步。