Canon law and attempts on ecclesiastical reform within the change of the Merovingien and Carolingian realm: The Collectio Vetus gallica and it's context within manuscript tradition.

该项目的主要主题是法兰西亚区最早的系统典范收藏：《Vtus Gallica合集》。这些收藏品只在8世纪第二季度科比修道院编辑过的版本中流传下来。这个版本第一次由休伯特·莫尔德克进行了批判性的编辑，被认为是与宫殿的加洛林市长有关的教会改革的早期证据。这个项目，从七月一号开始。2021年，重点关注与该收藏相关的几个文本，这些文本具有不同的构图和手稿传统的一致性。因此，定义了四个不同的调查层次：第一个层次是关于这些文本内容的连贯性。特别注意的是与教皇权威有关的大量文本。在第二个层面上，对文本和历史背景的传播问题进行了审查和澄清，同时还准备了基于维特斯加里卡传统的批评版本，这些版本到目前为止还没有从编辑上推导出来。同时，还检查了整个传输综合体的后效和收藏品的接收情况。在第三个层面上，通过对传播的文本和历史语境的考察提供的结果与莫德克的结果相结合，重新思考他在两个手稿类别中的区别。在这方面，主要的焦点在于基于这两个类别之间在内容、来源和编校动机方面的差异的问题，以及Corbie中集合的假定编校。另一种假设是，由于同一地点和同一时间的不同编辑过程，解释了传统中的差异的可能性。这些分析的结果集中在第四级，以便将传输综合体及其四个阶段的编校和接收更准确地纳入加洛林早期改革的背景中。请求延长该项目的目的是为了能够将更多的文本纳入对手稿传输和编辑的更详细的批判性分析，以便在更有价值的基础上确保和具体说明以前的成果。尤其是主教格雷戈里一595和他的讨论很多，最近编辑的“Libellus Responsionum”，以及Paenitentiale Remense，这是特别有趣的在其编辑，接受和历史背景下，对于这一分析相当可观。

Main subject of the project is the earliest systematic canonical collection in the Francia: The Collectio Vetus Gallica. This collection is passed on only in a version redacted in the monastery of Corbie in the second quarter of the 8th century. This version was critically edited by Hubert Mordek for the first time and was valued as early evidence of ecclesiastical reforms connected to the Carolingian mayors of the palace. This project, that started on July 01. 2021, is focussing on several texts associated with the collection in different compositions and consistencies in the manuscript tradition. Thus four different levels of investigation have been defined: The first level is about the coherence of the content of these texts. Special attention is drawn to an amount of texts connected to papal authority. On the second level, questions of textual and historical contexts of transmission are examined and clarified alongside the preparation of critical editions based on the Vetus Gallica tradition, which have not been deduced editorially so far. Simultaneously the aftereffects of the entire transmission complex and the reception of the collection are also examined. On the third level the results provided by the examination of the textual and historical contexts of transmission are combined with Mordek’s results to rethink his differentiation in two manuscript classes. In this regard the main focus lies on the questions based on the differences between those two classes concerning content, knowledge of the sources and the redactors’ motivations compared to each other and the assumed redaction of the collection in Corbie. An alternate assumption is the possibility explaining the differences in the tradition as a result of a differentiated editing process at the same place and at the same time. The results of those analyses are brought together on the fourth level in order to contextualize the transmission complex and its four stages of redactions and its reception more precisely within the early Carolingian reforms. The requested extension of the project is intended to make it possible to include further texts in a more detailed critical analysis of manuscript transmission and editing in order to secure and specify the previous results on a more valuable basis. Especially the Synod of Gregory I. of 595 and his much discussed and lately edited “Libellus Responsionum” as well as the Paenitentiale Remense, which is particularly interesting in terms of its editing, reception and historical context, are considerable for this analysis.