Research on meanings of the description of the nature in Peter Handke's literature

在这一研究中，我试图用对自然和事物的描写来证明彼得·韩德克在其文学作品中所写的历史政治批评。70年代中期，他将语言批评作为社会的批评者的主要文学主题转变为叙事作品，将理想的文学世界表达为对现实日常生活的对抗。韩德克叙事文学的主要动机之一是与他的家庭有关。但他的文学目的并不是描述自己家族的真实历史，而是表达文学语言的可能性和价值。这意味着韩德克的文学同时有两个不同的主题，一方面是在真实话语的现实中实现理想的文学世界，另一方面是如何追寻真实的话语。出于这个目的，他试图在大自然中寻找给予叙述者文学想象力的东西或风景，并为他们所感知的事物找到正确的词语。在我的研究中，我处理了彼得·汉克的三部作品：《Wunschloses Ungluck》(1972)，《Die Lehre der Stainte Victe Victoire》(1980)和《Die Wiederholung》(1986)。

In this research I tried to prove the historically political critics which Peter Handke wrote in his literary works with descriptions of the nature and the things.In the middle of seventies he changed his main literary subject on the language critics as a critic of the society into narrative works expressing an ideal literary world as an opposition to the real daily life. One of main motives of Handke's narrative literature is related to his family. But it is not his literary purpose to describe the real history of his own family but to express the possibility and the value of the literary language. That means Handke's literature has two different subjects at the same time, on one hand the realization of the ideal literary world in the reality of authentic words, on the other hand the question how to reach after such authentic words.For that purpose he tries to find things or landscapes in the nature which give literary imaginations to his narrators, and also to find correct words for things they perceive as signs.In my research I treated the following three works of Peter Handke to confirm my thesis ; "Wunschloses Ungluck" (1972), "Die Lehre der Stainte Victoire" (1980) and "Die Wiederholung" (1986).