Philological Research of Novgorodian and Muscovite Chronicles in the 15^<th> Century

本研究项目旨在研究15世纪的诺夫哥罗德和莫斯科编年史的编纂史，通过“文本学”（文本批评）和来源分析的方法，考察编年史文本的引用来源和编辑变化和补充。在这个项目中，我提交了三篇论文：1)“诺夫哥罗德-卡拉姆津编年史（1^< 20世纪60年代部分）：文本和评论”，在这篇论文中，我对这部15^< 18世纪诺夫哥罗德和莫斯科编年史的关键编年史进行了全面的来源分析。很明显，编年史的编辑们试图从亲诺夫哥罗德的立场来改写早期罗斯的官方历史。2)在第二篇论文“重新思考假设的诺夫哥罗德编年史Sofiskii VremenniK”中，我对诺夫哥罗德-卡拉姆辛编年史进行了更详细的分析，并指出了诺夫哥罗德教会对编年史编纂产生严重影响的具体立场。3)论文《索非亚第一编年史的一些特色编辑倾向》对这部莫斯科著名编年史进行了文本批判，主要是与《诺夫哥罗德第一编年史》和《诺夫哥罗德-卡拉姆津编年史》进行比较。我的结论是，编者的目的是通过编纂新的编年史来证明莫斯科公国在俄罗斯历史上的合法性。

This research project aims to study history of compilation of Novgorodian and Muscovite chronicles in the 15^<th> century by examining sources of citation and editorial changes and additions in chronicle texts by the method of "texological" (text critic) and source analysis. In the project I presented three papers : 1)"Novgorod-Karamzin Chronicle (1^<st> section) : text and commentaries", in which I made total source analysis of this key chronicle to the history of Novgorodian and Muscovite chronicles in the 15^<th> century. It is obvious that editors of the chronicle tried to remake official history of early Rus from the view point of pro-Novgorod position. 2)In the second paper "Rethinking the Hypothetical Novgorodian Chronicle Sofiskii VremenniK" I made more detail analysis of Novgorod-Karamzin Chronicle and pointed out specific Novgorod Church position that had a serious influence on compiling the chronicle. 3)In paper "Some Characteristic Editorial Tendencies of Sofia Fist Chronicle" text critic of this famous Muscovite chronicle was made mainly in comparison with Novgorod First Chronicle and Novogorod-Karamzin Chronicle. I concluded that the editors aimed to demonstrate legitimacy of Muscovy in the history of Rus by making a new chronicle.