The research on socially shared cognition in Network RPG

本研究的目的是利用网络RPG的特点来考察共享表征的形成过程。在实验研究中，我们考察了信息的初始分配及其共享过程对群体问题解决任务绩效的影响。在本实验中，我们分析了视觉交互和转换交互。108名大学生参加了这次活动。比赛的目标是在45分钟内逃出迷宫。每个参与者都有不同的信息，并通过游戏找到信息。聊天日志记录了协议，动作捕捉记录了游戏中的行为。比赛结束后，参与者被要求填写调查问卷。结果表明，TO-AMS在赛场上布设时效果较好。虽然如果不分享每个成员的场景，他的聊天互动的赌注就会减少，但即使没有协议，动作中的合作互动也是可能的。然而，最有效的球队在比赛早些时候抽到了未共享的信息。有效团队共享其角色结构的元认知。此外，还进行了CMC的模拟陪审团实验。实验设计为2×2×2。-证据(有罪或无罪)×分享信息量(高或低)×讨论过程(判决主动或证据主动)。48名大学生参加了调查。因此，那些拥有与其证据模式一致的未共享信息的成员以及那些共享了与其身份不符的信息的成员引发了讨论。

The purpose of this research was to examine the formation process of shared represen tation taking advantage of the feature of Network RPG. In the experiment study, we ex amined the effect of the initial distribution of information and its shared process on the performance of group problem solving task. In this experiment, both visual and convers ational interaction was analyzed. The 108 university students participated. The goal of t he game was to escape from the maze in the 45 minutes. Each participant had the diff erent information and found information through the game. The protocol recorded by th e chat log, and the behavior in the game was recorded by the motion capture. After the game, the participants were asked to fill the questionnaire. Results showed that the to ams were rather effective when they were spread over the game field. Although he am punt of chat interaction decreased if a scene of each member was not shared, the coop erative interaction in actions was possible even if there is no protocol. However, the m ost effective team drew unshared information earlier in the play. The effective teams a Iso shared the meta-cognition of their role structure. Moreover, mock jury experiments by CMC were conducted. The design of experiment is 2 X 2 x 2. - Evidence (guilty or i nnocence) X Amount o shared information (high or low) x Discussion process (verdict ini tiative or evidence initiative). The 48 university students participated. As a result, the members who had unshared information consistent with their schema of evidence led di scussion as well as the members who had shared information inconsistent with their se hema.