The Research of the Discussion about the Economization of the public Administrations

本研究的目的是从法理学的角度确认新福利经济学，特别是新制度经济学学派对法学和政策制定的意义和作用范围。日本行政法领域还没有这样的研究。在本研究中，我主要研究了两个领域。第一本是铃村幸太郎教授为研究生院学生编写的关于微观经济学的教科书，它处理了效率与公平、福利经济学与社会选择、个人权利与社会选择之间的关系。我的结论是，正如铃村教授恰如其分地坚持的那样，一个试图对社会条件提出适当建议的规范经济学，必须考虑到除有效性之外的各种其他信息，例如个人的残疾、社会条件的最终健康。而法理学已经考虑到了这一信息。因此，从政策制定的角度，保持法学与微观经济学之间的对话是非常重要的。我有一个计划，在这项研究的基础上发表一篇关于德国公共行政节约化的讨论的论文，例如我的第二个研究领域，涉及的主题与我的研究类似。

The Purpose of this research is to confirm the significance and the effective range of the new welfare economics, especially of the new institutional school of economics for the jurisprudence and policy-making in view of the jurisprudence. There has been no such study in the field of the administrative Law in Japan. In this study I have researched two main fields. The first is these Professor Kotaro Suzumura's textbook about the micro economics for the Students of the Graduate Schools, which deals with the relationships between the effectiveness and the equity, welfare economics and social choice, and Individual Rights and Social choice. I concluded that a normative economic, which attempts to the adequate proposal for social conditions, as Professor Suzumura duly insisted, must take accounting of the variety of other information than the effectiveness, e. g. handicaps of individuals, the definitive wellness of the social conditions. And the jurisprudence has taken account of this information. It is therefore very important for us to maintain the dialogue between the jurisprudence and the micro economics in view of the policy-making. I have a plan, to publish a on the basis of this research the paper about that discussions about that economizing of the public administrations in Germany, e. g. my second research field, which deal with the subject similar to that of my study.