Correlative System Interferences – On the Relationship between Public Law and Private Law on the Example of Financial Services Regulatory Law

相关制度干扰——以金融服务监管法为例论公法与私法的关系

• 批准号: 493632193
• 负责人: Privatdozent Dr. Dominik Schäfers
• 金额: --
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/493632193?language=en
• 关键词: Correlative; System; Interferences; Relationship; between

The distinction between public law and private law is one of the fundamental distinctions within the national legal system. Nevertheless, there are manifold connections and overlaps between the legal sub-systems. In the application of law, they entail complex questions that have not yet been answered satisfactorily. Closing this research gap is the intention of this postdoctoral thesis. Based on general reflections on the relation of public law and private law, I developed a general doctrine of interference, understood as a set of rules guiding the application of law in the interface area of the legal sub-systems. The relationship between financial services regulatory law and private law will serve as a reference example. The doctrine of interference is based on the premise that the legal sub-systems are independent and of equal rank, and that this is precisely where the benefits of the dichotomy lie. One focus of the work is the development of a guiding principle to which dogmatics and methodology in the area of overlap of the legal sub-systems are committed. Whereas previous approaches have argued for the primacy of one over the other or for a far-reaching harmonization of public law and private law, I support the hypothesis that the legal sub-systems should be applied as independently and unaffected by each other as possible. In this way, the respective goals of the legal sub-systems and the potential stemming from the dichotomy can be realized and refined to the maximum extent possible. Coordination of the legal sub-systems is only necessary in exceptional cases if so-called obstructions arise between the partial legal systems: this is the case if coordination of the partial legal systems is mandatory on constitutional grounds or if uncoordinated coexistence of the legal sub-systems would significantly impede the realization of the objectives of one of the legal sub-systems. How obstructions are to be resolved is a matter I will address subsequently. The general methodological rules for resolving conflicts of norms prove to be inept. Rather, obstructions must be resolved by means of interferential concordance in such a way that the objectives of the conflicting legal sub-systems are realized to the greatest possible extent. I will then get to the specifics of how to implement this finding methodologically. One focus is on the specific features that must be taken into account in the reference framework of European Union law. In addition, I will examine to what extent methodologies specific to the particular sub-system have developed and the degree to which this calls for coordination in interface areas of the legal sub-systems as well. Finally, I will illustrate the applicability in practice of the principles developed by way of the example of unresolved disputes on the relation between financial services supervisory law and private law.

公法和私法之间的区别是国家法律的制度的基本区别之一。尽管如此，各法律的子系统之间仍存在多种联系和重叠。在适用法律方面，它们涉及复杂的问题，尚未得到令人满意的回答。填补这一研究空白是本博士后论文的目的。基于对公法和私法关系的一般性思考，我提出了一般干涉原则，将其理解为一套指导法律在法律的子系统的接口领域中的适用的规则。金融服务监管法与私法之间的关系将作为一个参考实例。干预理论的前提是，法律的次级系统是独立的，地位平等，而这正是二分法的好处所在。这项工作的一个重点是制定一项指导原则，法律的次级系统重叠领域的教义学和方法学都致力于遵循这项原则。虽然以前的方法都主张一个优先于另一个或一个深远的协调公法和私法，我支持的假设，即法律的子系统应尽可能独立和不受彼此影响。这样，法律的子系统的各自目标和二分法所产生的潜力就可以得到最大程度的实现和完善。只有在部分法律的制度之间出现所谓障碍的特殊情况下，才有必要协调法律的次级制度：在这种情况下，部分法律的制度的协调是宪法规定的强制性的，或者如果法律的次级制度不协调地共存会严重妨碍实现其中一个法律的次级制度的目标。如何解决这些障碍，我将在后面讨论。解决规范冲突的一般方法规则被证明是不合适的。相反，必须通过协调一致的方式解决障碍，使相互冲突的法律的子系统的目标尽可能实现。然后，我将具体讨论如何在方法上实现这一发现。一个重点是欧洲联盟法律参考框架必须考虑的具体特点。此外，我还将审查特定分系统的具体方法发展到何种程度，以及这在何种程度上要求在法律的分系统的接口领域进行协调。最后，我将通过金融服务监管法与私法之间关系的未决争议的例子来说明所开发的原则在实践中的适用性。