The General Researches into advanced aging and life selections -Compareing with Hokuriku- and Tokai Districts

我们对老龄化社会的变化和金泽和冈崎城市的比较研究很感兴趣，这两个城市在文化、传统和人口规模上都很相似。现代社会是“风险社会”。我们通过老年人生活方式个性化的事实来理解区域社会风险的出现。研究对象在工作、休闲、共同生活等方面的现状，这些问题在社区的“现实取向”中是重要而紧迫的。一般来说，内部区域（城市中心区）的空洞是由人口/家庭的动态来指出的。但是，社区是空洞的吗？我们在研究人们的生活中审视社区复兴的主题，而不是空洞的理论。支持和亲密的网络是怎样的？在金泽市金泽社区复兴委员会建议的基础上，我们必须努力保持内部/边缘地区的当地环境（制度制定，社区领导人培训和行动场所制定）。削弱区域团结是非常困难的。全球化也太引人注目了。许多老年人都很健康，很有潜力，而不是弱者。我们于11月~ 12月在金泽市和冈崎市进行了问卷调查。在1998年。这项调查是对2000名40岁以上和80岁以下的居民进行的。受访者的比例为63.8%（两个城市），结果和分析由每个作者在研究结果报告中报告

We are interested in changing of the advanced aging societies and comparative researches on Kanazawa-and Okazaki cities, These cities resemble in regard to cultures, traditions and sizes of populations. The modern societies are 'Risk societies'. We understand advent of risks in regional societies by facts of individualization in lifestyles of persons of advanced age. The objects of this researches try to grasp the present conditions in their working, leosure and living together, These problems are important and urgent in regard with 'reality approach' of community.In general, hollow of inner areas (center districts of cities) is pointed by dynamics of populations/households. But, are communities hollow ? We examine the themes of revival of communities in studying of peoples lives, not hollow theory. How are networks of support and intimacy ?In the basis of proposal by committee of Kanazawa Community revival in Kanazawa city, we must strive to maintain local environments in inner/fringe areas (system-making, training of community-leaders and action-places making). It is great difficult in weaking of regional solidarity. Globalization is too being remarkable. Many persons of advanced aging are healthy and potential, not the weak.We tried the survey(by questionnaires) in Kanazawa city and Okazaki city in Nov. 〜Dec. in 1998. Its survey was made on 2,000 residents of over forty and under eighty. The rate of respondents was 63.8%(in both cities), The results and analyses are being reported by each writers in the research results report