スターリン時代のコルホーズ農戸(ドヴォル)の研究

斯大林时代集体农庄（dvor）研究

• 批准号: 62530047
• 负责人: 松井 憲明
• 金额: $ 0.51万
• 依托单位: Asahikawa University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1987
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1987 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-62530047/
• 关键词: 農戸; ドヴォル; 農民家族; コルホーズ; 副業経営; 階級的差異の消滅; 都市と農村の対立農業集団化

最重要のマイクロ資料『社会主義農業』紙が版元の事情で購入不能となり, その結果追加請求した複写資料も入手が後れたため, 研究課題全体にわたる検討は完了するに至っていない. これまでは主に「研究の目的」中の第一の課題, つまり全面的農業集団化期の「農戸廃絶」論について, その前史(理念的, 歴史的背景)と本史(盛衰の経過および諸要因)の輪郭を明確にしようと務めてきた. その概要は次の通りである.(1)「農戸廃絶」論の形成に古典的マルクス主義の農業理論が重要な役割を演じたことは疑いない. しかし後者が展望した資本制発展に伴う農民層の消滅傾向は, 革命後のソヴェト農村では逆転しているか, あるいは微々たるものだったことに留意しなければならない.(2)ソ連自身の歴史的経験, とくに戦時共産主義期の農業コムーナ運動を考慮すべきである. そこではソヴェト農場と同様, 個別経営と, 従って農戸とが排除されており, このことが集団農場の一般的イメージを大きく規定した.(3)ネップ期には, 将来の集団農業に占める農戸の地位について, 具体的な研究や論議がなされなかった. 農戸それ自体に関する29年の論争でさえそうである.(4)全面的集団化の開始とともに, 農民経営の経済的自律性を根絶すべく, その法的主体たる農戸の制度的解消を説く「農戸廃絶」論が登場する. この理論は第17回党協議会(32年初)の「階級絶滅」論にも支えられ, 翌33年まで公的に維持される. (5)他方で, 個別経営を容認する農業アルテリ路線の定着, 食料事情悪化に対応するコルホーズ市場の導入や畜産物供出ノルマの設定, 個人家畜の奨励など, 集団農業の枠内で農戸制度の利用を必然, あるいは有利とする諸契機が成長してゆく.(6)35年の農業アルテリ模範定款は農戸制度を公的に復活させた. しかし「農戸廃絶」論は, 同定款に含まれた農戸資産の個別的「利用」規定のなかにその痕跡を留めており, 全面的な払拭は容易ではなかった.

The most important information is that you can't read the information in the second edition of Social Socialism Agriculture. In the end, you can add a copy of the copy of the data to start later. All the students in the research project have finished their studies. The purpose of the study is to focus on the first topic in the "purpose of research", that is, during the period of comprehensive agricultural centralization, the previous history (conceptual, historical background) and the current history (the key reasons for the rise and fall) clearly show that the information and information of the agricultural industry are not affected. The general outline of the agriculture industry is divided into two parts. (1) the discussion of "agricultural agriculture" has formed a classical theory of agricultural theory, which is an important part of the theory of agricultural theory. In the post-revolutionary period, farmers in rural areas did not pay attention to the development of the financial system. After the revolution, farmers in rural areas did not pay attention to the financial situation in rural areas after the revolution. (2) to pay attention to the history of their own income, and to pay attention to the financial situation in rural areas after the revolution. (2) to pay attention to the history of their own income. The rural rural areas are the same as each other, and the rural rural areas are excluded from the rural rural areas, and the general rural rural areas in the rural rural areas are subject to the regulations. (3) in the future, centralized agricultural farmers will not occupy the status of rural agricultural farmers in the future, and specific research proposals should not be conducted. For 29 years, there has been a war between the peasants and the peasants. (4) at the beginning of the comprehensive collectivization, the self-discipline of the peasants is at the root of the crisis, and the elimination of the agricultural system, which is the main body of the law, appears on the market. The 17th session of the Communist Party of China (early 32) held a meeting at the "level" to discuss the support and maintenance of the public. (5) it should be recognized by others that the route of the agricultural farm is set, the food supply system is set in the market, the supply of livestock food is set in the market, the individual and livestock are encouraged, and it is necessary to make use of the agricultural farm system in the agricultural farm. It is beneficial to the growth of rural economic institutions. (6) the 35-year model of the rural rural economic system has established a fixed income system for the agricultural sector. During the discussion of "agricultural tax", it is stipulated that in the same amount of money, it is easy to do so in a comprehensive way, including the separate "use" of agricultural data.