权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A comparative investigation of the legal methode at the school of Bourges and the process of formation of the modern legal history in the sixteenth-century-France

布尔日学派法律方法与16世纪法国近代法律史形成过程的比较考察——

基本信息

批准号：
03620004
负责人：
NISHIMURA Takayoshi
金额：
$ 1.34万
依托单位：
Ehime University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1991
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1991 至 1993
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In my opinion, the french legal study had various methodes and subjects in the early modern Europe, especially in the sixteenth century, even if it has chosen a new direction in general. For this prospect, I took notice of the individual activities of jurists and examined their own juristic works. For I think that these fundamental data make the point clear at the legal issues and legal theories, and that I am able to place these issues or theories in the contemporary ages.I have continued this research for three years from 1991. In the first stage, I made an investigation into the jurist Hugues Doneau and his methode. And he had a systematic intention on his own exegesis into roman legal sources. In the second, I tried to investigate on the contemporary jurist Francois Duaren and Francois Hotman, and so on. The aim of this approach is to compare one methode with others. And I came to a conclusion that, as Prof.Hans Erich Troje suggested, they extended their spheres of legal sources and their scopes of problesm in the juristic activity.Finally, I examined into the jurist Jacques Cujas and his works, particularly his "Observationes et Emendationes (1556-1596)". And it makes clear that he used his own approach to various legal sources from early period and he had no systematic intention. He placed each historical sources into each historical stages. This hitorical approach to analyze brought out a new methode to study a history of law and institution in this century and the next.

在我看来，在近代早期的欧洲，特别是在16世纪，法国法学研究的方法和主题多种多样，尽管它总体上选择了一个新的方向。对于这一前景，我注意到了法学家的个人活动，并审查了他们自己的法律作品。因为我认为这些基本数据在法律问题和法律理论上都是明确的，我能够把这些问题或理论放在当代，我从1991年开始持续了三年的研究。在第一阶段，我对法学家雨果·多诺及其方法进行了考察。他对自己对罗马法律渊源的注释也有系统的意图。第二部分对当代法学家弗朗索瓦·杜伦、弗朗索瓦·霍特曼等人进行了考察。这种方法的目的是将一种方法与其他方法进行比较。我得出的结论是，正如汉斯·埃里希·特洛伊教授所说，他们扩大了法律渊源的范围和法律活动中的问题范围。最后，我研究了法学家雅克·库哈斯和他的作品，特别是他的《观察和纠正(1556-1596)》。这表明，他从早期就对各种法律渊源采取了自己的方法，并没有系统的意图。他把每一部史料都放到了每一个历史阶段。这种发人深省的分析方法为研究本世纪和下个世纪的法律和制度史提供了一种新的方法。