A Follow-up Survey of Coping with the New National Course of Study

本研究在问卷调查的基础上，对学校进行问卷调查，将问卷调查分为五种类型，学校问卷调查包括学校现场调查（一个学校）和教师问卷调查（六个学校），前者包括调查课程制定过程的问题。后者包括调查对每个学校的组织气氛和组织气氛的意见的问题。本研究发现：（1）以量化分析方式分析董事会调查的回应-聚类分析将董事会的反应分为5种模式。(2)教育委员会重视绝对项目，而学校重视具体项目。(3)董事会的指导作为一项基本原则对学校产生影响。但他们倾向于根据先例来创建课程。(4)教师容易把它当作一个重要的绝对项目。(5)时间的分配和选题的调整被认为是一个问题。但教师往往把对新课程理念的顺应视为烦恼。

We carried out school surveys based upon a result of board surveys, We classified board survey respones into 5 patterns, School surveys consisted of school-site survey (one & school) and teacher survey(six a school), The former includes questions which investigate process of making curriculum. The latters includes questions which investigate opinions to curriculums and organizational climate of each school. This study found(1) Analyzing responses of board survey by quantifying-III extracted "aotivity" and "board intention-school intention". Cluster analysis classified board responces into 5 patterns.(2) Boards of aducation regard absolute items as an important, But in school they regard concrete items as an important.(3) Guidance of boards influent on schools as a fundamental principles. But they are apt to create curriculum based on precedents.(4) Teachers are apt to regard as an important absolute items.(5) Sharing of time and adjustment of selected subject are thought of as problems. But teachers tend to regard conformity to philosophy of new course of study as troubles.