Basic research of the relationship among the Imperial Court, the Shoguate goverment and the feudal lords domains on Samurai official rank in Early Modern Japan

本文从这两个方面确立了研究的目的，以期对日本近代早期权力结构的研究有所贡献。(1)确认近代不克看夷的礼仪事实，并阐明近代不克看夷制度。(2)为了阐明大名等级关系的形成、固定和变动的全过程，我们收集和研究了历史资料，证实了以下事实。(1)关于任命的程序、礼节和制度。(a)在大名的情况下，被任命为第四法院等级;起初，在江户，幕府将军下令任命，和Roujyu-幕府政府的部长给大名Roujyuhousho-一种信给京都Shoshidai-幕府将军在京都的裁判官。然后大名派人去了京都在京都，他们把这封信交给了正西代和武天增两位朝廷官员，并收到了长庭给他们的任命书--伊基、千次和久泽南。(b)如果是大名 ...更多信息 被任命为Shodaibu-第五法院排名;大名没有派他的人到京都，支付Koke-Shogun的使者Chotei的金钱和贡品执行过程中的京都。(c)在大名的情况下，只改变了在同一法院排名的官方职位的名称; Bakuhu给了他一个许可，Chotei没有参加任何活动。(d)在形式上，任何大名都不能申请提升他们的法院级别。但实际上，很多大名都是非正式申请的。(e)在一些大名的情况下，被任命为一些法院等级;一个Roujyuhousho被发给一个人。(f)如果幕府将军的一些Hatamoto直接家臣;为同时任命的一些人颁发了一份Roujyuhousho。(2)历时波动;（g）元禄（1688-1794）时期以后，大名藩对这一事件进行了文献记录，其中确定了过程和礼节的细节。(h)在文清（1818-1839）和文奎（1861-1864）时期，我们可以确认两个大的波动，其中一个法院排名分别上升。(i)针对文久时期的政治形势，幕府发起了对武科官仪制度的改革。(3)从史料研究来看，在这一过程中，有不少人，包括巴库胡、汉、周庭的成员，也有一些商人、工匠，参与其中，并作了各种各样的文献记载。从这个角度来看，我们做了这两个尝试。(j)将柔术法的风格分组。(k)对基础文献《武部民》的文献学研究。因此，我们研究了主要在17世纪中期以后产生的历史学资料，通过对武部官仪系统的说明，可以抓住长亭、幕府和大名之间关系波动的本质。少

We set up purpose of our research in these two points, for making a contribution to the studies on Early modern power structure in Japan.(1) To confirm the fact about the prpcess, courtesies, and to illuminate the system of Early Modern Buke Kan'i.(2) To illuminate the total process of formation, fixation and fluctuation in the relationship between the rank of the Daimyo.We colleected and studied the historical materials, and confirmed the followingfacts.(1) Concerning the process, courtesies, and system of appointment.(a) In case of a Daimyo was appointed over Shihon-the fourth court rank ; At first, in Edo, Shogun ordered to appoint, and Roujyu-ministers of Shogunate goverment gave the Daimyo a Roujyuhousho-a kind of letter to Kyoto Shoshidai-shogun's magistrate in Kyoto. Then, the Daimyo sent his men to Kyoto. In Kyoto, they handed the letter to Shosidai and Buketenso-two court officials, and received Iki, Senji and Kuzenan-letters of appointment from Chotei.(b) In case of a Daimyo … More was appointed Shodaibu-the fifth court rank ; The Daimyo did not send his men to Kyoto, pay the Koke-Shogun's messenger to Chotei the money and tribute to execute the process in Kyoto.(c) In case of a Daimyo changed only the name of official post staying in the same court rank ; Bakuhu gave him a permission, and Chotei did not take any part.(d) Formally, any Daimyo could not petition to rise their court rank. However, actually, many Daimyo made informal applications.(e) In case of some Daimyo was appointed some court rank ; one Roujyuhousho was issued for one person.(f) In case of some Hatamoto-direct retainer of the Shogun ; one Roujyuhousho was issued for some people who were appointed at the same time.(2) Diachronic fluctuation ;(g) After Genroku (1688-1794) perod, Daimyo domains made documentary records for the appointive affair, in which the details of the process and courtesies are ascertained.(h) In Bunsei (1818-1839) and Bunkyu (1861-1864) period, we can confirm two large fluctuations, in which rose in one court rank respectively.(i) On the political situation in Bunkyu period, Bakuhu initiated a reform of Buke Kan'i system.(3) From research on histriographical materials ; Through the process of appintment, many pcople, including the member of Bakuhu, Han, and Choutei, or some merc hants and craftmen, took their parts, and made various document ary records. in this point of view, We made these two attempts.(j) Group the styles of Roujyuhousho.(k) Bibliograhical study on "Bukcbunin"-one basic document.Thus, we researched the hisotoriographicla materials produced mainly after the midcenntury 17, through illumination the system of Buke Kan'i, could seize the essence of the fluctuation of the relationship among Chotei, Bakuhu, and Daimyo domains. Less