Basic research of the relationship among the Imperial Court, the Shoguate goverment and the feudal lords domains on Samurai official rank in Early Modern Japan

近代日本武士官衔上朝廷、幕府与诸侯领地关系的基础研究

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    06451062
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    日本
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
  • 财政年份:
    1994
  • 资助国家:
    日本
  • 起止时间:
    1994 至 1996
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

We set up purpose of our research in these two points, for making a contribution to the studies on Early modern power structure in Japan.(1) To confirm the fact about the prpcess, courtesies, and to illuminate the system of Early Modern Buke Kan'i.(2) To illuminate the total process of formation, fixation and fluctuation in the relationship between the rank of the Daimyo.We colleected and studied the historical materials, and confirmed the followingfacts.(1) Concerning the process, courtesies, and system of appointment.(a) In case of a Daimyo was appointed over Shihon-the fourth court rank ; At first, in Edo, Shogun ordered to appoint, and Roujyu-ministers of Shogunate goverment gave the Daimyo a Roujyuhousho-a kind of letter to Kyoto Shoshidai-shogun's magistrate in Kyoto. Then, the Daimyo sent his men to Kyoto. In Kyoto, they handed the letter to Shosidai and Buketenso-two court officials, and received Iki, Senji and Kuzenan-letters of appointment from Chotei.(b) In case of a Daimyo … More was appointed Shodaibu-the fifth court rank ; The Daimyo did not send his men to Kyoto, pay the Koke-Shogun's messenger to Chotei the money and tribute to execute the process in Kyoto.(c) In case of a Daimyo changed only the name of official post staying in the same court rank ; Bakuhu gave him a permission, and Chotei did not take any part.(d) Formally, any Daimyo could not petition to rise their court rank. However, actually, many Daimyo made informal applications.(e) In case of some Daimyo was appointed some court rank ; one Roujyuhousho was issued for one person.(f) In case of some Hatamoto-direct retainer of the Shogun ; one Roujyuhousho was issued for some people who were appointed at the same time.(2) Diachronic fluctuation ;(g) After Genroku (1688-1794) perod, Daimyo domains made documentary records for the appointive affair, in which the details of the process and courtesies are ascertained.(h) In Bunsei (1818-1839) and Bunkyu (1861-1864) period, we can confirm two large fluctuations, in which rose in one court rank respectively.(i) On the political situation in Bunkyu period, Bakuhu initiated a reform of Buke Kan'i system.(3) From research on histriographical materials ; Through the process of appintment, many pcople, including the member of Bakuhu, Han, and Choutei, or some merc hants and craftmen, took their parts, and made various document ary records. in this point of view, We made these two attempts.(j) Group the styles of Roujyuhousho.(k) Bibliograhical study on "Bukcbunin"-one basic document.Thus, we researched the hisotoriographicla materials produced mainly after the midcenntury 17, through illumination the system of Buke Kan'i, could seize the essence of the fluctuation of the relationship among Chotei, Bakuhu, and Daimyo domains. Less
在这两点上,我们确立了研究的目的,以期对日本近代权力结构的研究有所贡献:(1)确认近代早期武科菅直人的过程、礼仪和制度。(2)阐明大名军衔关系的形成、固定和变动的全过程。我们收集和研究史料,确认了以下事实:(1)关于过程、礼仪和任命制度。(A)大名被任命为世宏--第四朝廷军衔;起初,在江户,幕府命令官任命,幕府大臣Roujyu给了大名一封Roujyuhousho--这是给京都Shoshidai-Sogun京都知事的一封信。然后,大名派他的人去京都。在京都,他们将这封信交给了Shosiai和Buketenso--两名法院官员,并从Chotei那里收到了Iki、Senji和Kuzenan的聘书。(B)如果是大名…更多的人被任命为正大部--第五宫廷军衔;大名并没有派他的人去京都,向Koke-Shogun的信使乔泰支付在京都执行这一进程的金钱和贡品。(C)如果是大名,只更改了留在同一宫廷军衔的官员的名字;白居湖给予了他许可,卓泰没有参与。(D)正式地,任何大名都不能申请提升他们的宫廷军衔。然而,实际上,许多大名都提出了非正式的申请。(E)如果一些大名被任命为某个宫廷官衔;一个人被颁发一个Roujyuhousho。(F)如果是一些幕府的直接家臣,则为一些同时被任命的人颁发一个Rojyuhousho。(2)历时波动;(H)在文世(1818-1839年)和文殊(1861-1864年)两个时期,我们可以确认两次较大的波动,分别上升到一个宫廷级别。(I)在文殊时期的政治局势上,白居湖发起了一次不可改的菅直制改革。在附赠的过程中,许多人,包括巴库胡人、汉人、楚台人,以及一些商人和工匠,都拿出了自己的零件,并做了各种文书记录。有鉴于此,我们进行了以下两方面的尝试:(J)对《柔柔后书》的文体进行分类。(K)对《北国志》这一基本文献的文献学研究。因此,我们研究的主要是17年中期以后产生的同位素材,通过对北国系统的启发,能够抓住楚帝、白库胡、大名三个域之间关系变化的本质。较少

项目成果

期刊论文数量(11)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
藤田 覚: "近世武家官位の叙任手続きについて-諸大夫成の場合-" 日本歴史. 586号. 18-33 (1997)
藤田悟:“关于近代早期武士官衔的授予程序——以封建领主为例——”《日本史》第586期18-33(1997年)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
箱石 大: "幕末期武家官位制の改変" 日本歴史. 577号. 82-100 (1996)
Dai Hakoishi:“江户时代末期武士官衔制度的变化”《日本历史》第 577 期。82-100(1996 年)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
鶴田 啓: "近世大名の官位叙任過程-対馬藩主宗義倫、義誠の事例を中心に-" 日本歴史. 577号. 64-81 (1996)
鹤田圭:“早期近代大名的册封过程——以对马岛主吉通和吉政为例——”《日本史》第577期64-81(1996年)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
FUJITA,Satoru: "The Process of the investiture of Syodaibu-the fifth court rank, in Early Modern" Japanese History. No. 586. 18-331 (1997)
藤田悟:“近代早期日本历史中第五宫廷级别——Syodaibu 的授予过程。”
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
TSURATA,Kei: "The Process of the investirure of a Daimyo in Early Modern ; mainly on the case of the lord of Tushima Sou Yoshitugu, Sou Yoshoiobu" Japanese History. No. 577. 64-81 (1996)
TSURATA,Kei:“近代早期大名的授予过程;主要是关于Tushima Sou Yoshitugu,Sou Yoshoiobu的案例”日本历史。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

HASHIMOTO Masanobu其他文献

HASHIMOTO Masanobu的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了