Comparative Study of Creolism in Immigrant Societies

移民社会中克里奥尔主义的比较研究

• 批准号: 07041005
• 负责人: KIMURA Hideo
• 金额: $ 11.2万
• 依托单位: The University of Tokyo
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
• 财政年份: 1995
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1995 至 1997
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-07041005/
• 关键词: CREOLE; CARIBBEAN SEA; OVEASEAS COLONY; SUZERAIN NATIONS; INDIVIDUALITY; CULTURAL AUTONOMY; UNIVERSALITY; POLITICAL-ECONOMIC REGIME; 文化的主張; 文化的適応; 人権; 居住空間; 中華圏; 黒人性; 国民文化; 華人; 先住民; 社会文化的偏差; クレオール化; ヨーロッパ伝統; アフリカ伝統; 植民地主義; 経済的従属; 世界

The results of this research project through 1995 to 1997 are as follows ;1. The Creolism in the Caribbean Area and the MigratonOn the basis of field research in 1995 and 1996, it can be concludes that, 1) although the phenomena of the creolism can be found in many parts of this area, the types of creolism are distinct each other, and it would be diificult to consider this area as an integrated one ; 2) the differences among the basic policies on culture in European states who established the colonies in this area has divided and are dividing the Caribbean Cultures ; 3) the colonial political-economic regimes, which even nowadays maintain the influences in the Caribbeau area, produce the cultural differences and the modes of immigration on this area ; 4) the differences of actual political regime (republics, overseas territories, or dominions) form the basis of cultural differences.2. The Creolism in the World and the MigrationOn the basis of field research in 1996 and 1997, realized by the japanese researchers in their respective research areas and the foreign researchers on their hohelands, it can be concluded that, 1) when we cmpare the European countries who owned colonies, we can find many differences in their political-cutlural positions on the migaration among such contries as, Holand which is very sensible to the cultural influences of the migrants, Germany for which the problem of the overseas colonies is negligible, France which treat the problem of the migrants as the general issue like the human rights, and United China where the creolism appears not to be her central issue, the existence of the oveaseas chinese people who have been creplized shed lights on the problem of "What if China" and diffines its cultural boundariys 3) when some native people like brazilian native people claim their cultural autonomy, their culture in reality are the creole cultures

本研究项目1995年至1997年的研究成果如下： 1．加勒比地区的克里奥尔主义和移民根据1995年和1996年的实地调查，可以得出以下结论：1）虽然该地区的许多地方都存在克里奥尔主义现象，但克里奥尔主义的类型各不相同，很难将该地区视为一个整体； 2）在该地区建立殖民地的欧洲国家文化基本政策的差异已经分裂并正在分裂加勒比文化； 3）殖民政治经济体制至今仍对加勒比地区产生影响，产生了该地区的文化差异和移民方式； 4）实际政体（共和国、海外领地或自治领）的差异构成了文化差异的基础。2．世界克里奥尔主义与移民根据日本研究人员在各自研究领域和外国研究人员在荷兰的1996年和1997年的田野调查，我们可以得出这样的结论：1）当我们比较拥有殖民地的欧洲国家时，我们可以发现他们在移民问题上的政治文化立场存在许多差异，例如荷兰，它对欧洲文化的影响非常敏感。 移民问题，德国对海外殖民地的问题可以忽略不计，法国将移民问题视为像人权一样的普遍问题，而统一中国则认为克里奥尔主义似乎不是她的中心问题，海外华人的存在揭示了“如果中国”的问题，并界定了其文化边界3）当一些土著人如巴西土著人声称自己的文化 自治，他们的文化实际上是克里奥尔文化

项目成果

MASUDA,Kazuo: "The Thought of the Technofobia" Gendaishiso. vol.25-8. 240-249 (1997)

增田和夫：“技术恐惧症的思想”Gendaishiso。

足立 信彦: "言語・人種・多様性" 言語・国家、そして権力. 47-75 (1997)

安达信彦：“语言、种族和多样性”《语言、民族和权力》47-75 (1997)。

山内昌之,増田一夫,村田雄二郎: "帝国とは何か" 岩波書店, 269 (1997)

山内正之、增田一夫、村田雄二郎：“什么是帝国？” 269 (1997)

高橋 均: "シモン・ボリ-バルの<ジャマイカ書簡>にみる開発と先住民族と革命" 開発と文化2. (1997)

高桥仁：“西蒙·玻利瓦尔牙买加书信中的发展、土著人民和革命”《发展与文化》2。（1997）

KIMURA,Hideo: Mythes in harmony. Sekaishisosha, 262 (1996)

木村秀夫：和谐的神话。