Comparative Study of Creolism in Immigrant Societies

本研究项目1995 - 1997年的研究结果如下：加勒比海地区的克里奥尔现象与移民根据1995年和1996年的实地调查，可以得出如下结论：1)虽然在该地区许多地方都可以发现克里奥尔现象，但克里奥尔现象的类型相互区别，很难将该地区视为一个整体；2)在该地区建立殖民地的欧洲国家在文化基本政策上的差异，已经并正在分裂加勒比文化；(3)直到今天仍对加勒比地区产生影响的殖民政治经济制度，造成了该地区的文化差异和移民模式；4)实际政治制度（共和国、海外领土或自治领）的差异构成了文化差异的基础。在1996年和1997年日本学者在各自研究领域和国外学者对其殖民地进行实地考察的基础上，我们可以得出以下结论：1)当我们比较拥有殖民地的欧洲国家时，我们可以发现他们在移民问题上的政治文化立场存在许多差异，荷兰对移民的文化影响非常敏感；对于海外殖民地问题可以忽略的德国，将移民问题视为人权一般问题的法国，以及克里奥主义似乎不是其核心问题的统一中国，被“creolism”化的海外华人的存在，揭示了“如果中国”的问题，并界定了其文化边界。他们的文化实际上是克里奥尔文化

The results of this research project through 1995 to 1997 are as follows ;1. The Creolism in the Caribbean Area and the MigratonOn the basis of field research in 1995 and 1996, it can be concludes that, 1) although the phenomena of the creolism can be found in many parts of this area, the types of creolism are distinct each other, and it would be diificult to consider this area as an integrated one ; 2) the differences among the basic policies on culture in European states who established the colonies in this area has divided and are dividing the Caribbean Cultures ; 3) the colonial political-economic regimes, which even nowadays maintain the influences in the Caribbeau area, produce the cultural differences and the modes of immigration on this area ; 4) the differences of actual political regime (republics, overseas territories, or dominions) form the basis of cultural differences.2. The Creolism in the World and the MigrationOn the basis of field research in 1996 and 1997, realized by the japanese researchers in their respective research areas and the foreign researchers on their hohelands, it can be concluded that, 1) when we cmpare the European countries who owned colonies, we can find many differences in their political-cutlural positions on the migaration among such contries as, Holand which is very sensible to the cultural influences of the migrants, Germany for which the problem of the overseas colonies is negligible, France which treat the problem of the migrants as the general issue like the human rights, and United China where the creolism appears not to be her central issue, the existence of the oveaseas chinese people who have been creplized shed lights on the problem of "What if China" and diffines its cultural boundariys 3) when some native people like brazilian native people claim their cultural autonomy, their culture in reality are the creole cultures