STUDY ON EVALUATION OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC EXCHANGE PROGRAM IN MEDICAL SCIENCE

医学国际学术交流项目评价研究

• 批准号: 07670425
• 负责人: FUKUHARA Shunichi
• 金额: $ 1.41万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1995
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1995 至 1997
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-07670425/
• 关键词: Core university system; situation of the counterpart contry; publication of the achievement; elements of evaluation; analytic methodology; follow up; 途上国の特性; 評価細目; 回答方法; チェック機能; 多変量解析; 拠点大学方式の見直し; 対象国の的確な状況把握; 交流成果の公表; フォローアップ計画; 国際交流評価; 保

International academic exchange in medical science by Japanese academic institution has increased its activities year after year. However, increase in numbers of activities itself one of many parameters to reflect the degree of achievements from international academic exchange in Japan. In this study, we attempted to review past activities of international academic exchange in medical science and at the same time to apply this result to the establishment of methodolgy of evaluation of exchange programs. We reviewed past activities by The University of Tokyo and Kobe University and extracted five main elements necessary for meaningful evaluation.1. Current situation of health care and medical education of the counterpart country or region2. To support research activities of the counterpart researchers3. Research subjects and contents4. Publication of researbh achievements5. Continuity and follow up systemThese five major elements are considered to be minimumly essential for meaningful e … More valuation based upon current situation of developing countries. These five elements were further classified and ten sub-elements were extracted from each major element respectively : For 1, geographical, political, socio-cultural, water supply, population, disease prevalence, cause of death, medical institute, medical professionals, basic living environment. For 2, language, climate, custom, religion, neighborhood, living =xpenses, transportation. For 3, type of research (experimental vs observational), =leld, survey, clinical vs basic vs social science etc. For 4, scientific meeting, original article, report etc. For 5, contribution to community or counterpart country, funding resource to support continuity and follow up. Based upon the above, we preposed evaluation method according to fifty sub-elements, using a multiple methods of data collection such as through interview, questionnaire, observation, etc. For objective and fair purpose, evaluation by independent third party is essential. At final stage, quantitative analysis of the result using multi evaluate analytic method are recommended. Less

日本学术机构的国际医学学术交流活动逐年增多。然而，活动数量的增加本身是反映日本国际学术交流成果程度的众多参数之一。在本研究中，我们试图回顾过去的医学国际学术交流活动，同时将此结果应用于交流项目评估方法的建立。我们回顾了东京大学和神户大学过去的活动，并提取了有意义评价所必需的五个主要要素。1 .对应国家或地区的卫生保健和医学教育现状支持对口研究人员的研究活动。研究对象和内容发表研究成果。连续性和后续系统这五个主要要素被认为是有意义的可持续发展的最基本要素。对这五个要素进行进一步分类，并从每个主要要素中分别提取出十个子要素：对于1，地理、政治、社会文化、供水、人口、患病率、死亡原因、医疗机构、医疗专业人员、基本生活环境。2、语言、气候、风俗、宗教、邻里、生活费用、交通。对于3，研究类型（实验vs观察），= eld，调查，临床vs基础vs社会科学等。4、科学会议、原创文章、报告等。5 .对社区或对应国家的贡献，支持连续性和后续行动的资金资源。在此基础上，采用访谈、问卷调查、观察等多种数据收集方法，提出了基于50个子要素的评价方法。为了达到客观公正的目的，独立的第三方评估是必不可少的。在最后阶段，建议采用多评价分析法对结果进行定量分析。少