A Basic Theory of Antimonopoly Law and Economic Law

反垄断法与经济法基础理论

• 批准号: 07802005
• 负责人: TSUCHIDA Kazuhiro
• 金额: $ 1.15万
• 依托单位: Waseda University (1997)Shizuoka University (1995-1996)
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1995
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1995 至 1997
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-07802005/
• 关键词: Antimonopoly Law; Economic Law; Deregulation; Neo-Liberalism; Social Justice; Law & Economics; J.Rawls; R.A.Posner; 防壁の戦略; 複合的平等; 多元的正義; 全面的商品化; 新古典派市場効率モデル; シカゴ学派; 市場不可譲性; 不完全な商品化; 私的財産関係; 代替可能財産関係; 社会的基本財; 平等な自由の原理; 公正な機会均等原理; 格差原理

Theories in the field of Japanese anti-monopoly law or economic law in 1990s appear to have close relationships with the Neo-liberalistic theories in the United States. Chicago School of Antitrust Law is a typical Neo-liberalistic theory in America, which has an utilitarian basis that legality of a conduct is judged according to the increase or decrease of the consumers' surplus and the producers' surplus, and an inclination toward "universal commodification" that all things can and should be exchanged through the free market insofar as the seller and the buyer agree.Themes for a countervailing alternative theory to examine are :1) how limits of commodification should be set (limitation of the market boundary) and2) how a theory of rights must be established against the utilitarian principle of wealth maximization (rights-theory based structuralization of the market connotation).As to the boundary of the market, we can decide it according to M.J.Radin's theory of market-inalienability. As to the structuralization of the market connotation, we should learn from J.Rawls's theory of Justice and set the order of priority among people's requires. That is, it is necessary for a model of the legal structure corresponding to egalitarian market economy to set the order of priority among foundational rights to live or to life and health, property rights as human rights, medium-sized enterprises's property rights and monopoly property, in addition to an institutionalization of the Difference principle, that is an institutionalization of a system to distribute outcomes of natural human talents among competitors.Many measures of deregulation in Japan should also be evaluated from the viewpoint of limitation of the market boundary and the structuralization of the market connotation.

20世纪90年代日本反垄断法或经济法领域的理论似乎与美国的新自由主义理论有着密切的联系。芝加哥反垄断法学派是美国典型的新自由主义理论，其功利主义基础是根据消费者剩余和生产者剩余的增减来判断行为的合法性，以及“普遍商品化”的倾向只要买卖双方同意，所有的东西都可以而且应该通过自由市场进行交换。本文主要探讨的两个理论问题是：1）商品化的限度应该如何设定（市场边界的限度）; 2）权利理论应该如何在财富最大化的功利主义原则下建立（基于权利理论的市场内涵结构化）。在市场内涵的结构化方面，我们应借鉴罗尔斯的正义理论，在人们的需求中确立优先顺序。也就是说，除了区别原则的制度化之外，与平等主义市场经济相对应的法律的结构模式还需要确定基本的生命权或生命健康权、作为人权的财产权、中型企业的财产权和垄断财产权之间的优先顺序，这是一种制度化的制度，在竞争者之间分配自然人才的成果。日本的许多放松管制的措施也应该从市场边界的限制和结构化的角度来评估。市场内涵

项目成果

Kazuhiro TSUCHIDA: ""Market-Imperialism" and the Modern Theories of Justice" Science in Law. No.26. 39-57 (1997)

Kazuhiro TSUCIDA：““市场帝国主义”和现代正义理论”法学。

土田和博: "規制緩和-改革とグローバリゼーションの時代の中で-" 法律時報. 70巻3号. 47-51 (1998)

Kazuhiro Tsuchida：“放松管制——改革和全球化时代”Law Jiho，第 70 卷，第 3. 47-51 期（1998 年）。

土田 和博: "人格・財産・市場と法-M.J.Radin理論の-考察" 法経論集. 75. 19-36 (1996)

Kazuhiro Tsuchida：“人格、财产、市场和法律 - M.J. Radin 理论的研究”Hokei Ronshu 75. 19-36 (1996)。

土田和博: "人格・財産・市場と法-M.J.Radin理論の一考察" 法経論集. 75号. 19-36 (1996)

Kazuhiro Tsuchida：“人格、财产、市场和法律 - M.J. Radin 理论的研究” Hokei Ronshu No. 75. 19-36 (1996)。

土田 和博: "市場イデオロギーと現代社会正義論" 法の科学. 26号. 39-57 (1997)

土田一宏：《市场意识形态与现代社会正义理论》《法学》26期第39-57期（1997）。