A EXPERIMANTAL STUDY ON HOW TO EVALUATE SOCIAL CONSENSUS FOR PLANS TO RESOLVE SOME LOCAL PROBLEMS

为了实施解决地方社会问题的计划，必须将解决计划与全球问题进行社会协调。本研究旨在提出一个评价社会共识过程的框架。在第一年(1995年)，我们已经意识到了社会正义，尤其是在一个由不同价值观的人组成的社会中。具体地说，我们论证了分配正义的几种逻辑，即自我责任模式和平均主义模式。在这些模型中，我们对非自愿部分和自我负责部分进行了区分，并认为前一部分应该在每个人身上是相等的。与这些理论观点相平行的是，我们构建了一个超博弈的学习模型来呈现一个社会决策过程，而不是基于Bays理论，而是一种可拓学习。利用这个学习模型，我们分析了多功能城邦(MEP)项目，该项目的目标是与澳大利亚和日本的产业投资合作，开发一个兼具高科技和高触觉功能的未来主义国际城市。他们目前对MFP还没有开始，我们检查了两种误解；一种是基于谣言和疑虑的“飞地问题”，另一种是澳大利亚新闻机构如何报道日本公司的投资意愿。调查结果表明，最初的MFP概念存在过多的复杂性，项目承办方未能建立良好的公共关系，特别是对澳大利亚国内的新机构。

To implement plans for resolution of problems in local societies, it is essential to make social concensus for the resolution plans in contrast with global problems. This study aims to propose a framework to evaluate a process of social consensus in veiw of a social decison process.In the first year (1995) , we had become aware of social justice to make a consensus especially in a society which consists of persons with various values. Concretely, we argue some logics of distributive justice, namely, a model of self-responsiblity and one of egalitarianism. In these models, we make a distinction between involuntary parts and self-responsible ones, and argue that former parts should only be equalized on each person.In parallel with these theoretical arguments, we construct a learning model on a hyper-game to present a process of social decision, not based upon the Bays theory but an extension learning. Using this learning model, we analyze Multi-Function Polis (MEP) project, which was aiming to develop a futuristic international city including both 'high-tech' and 'high-touch' functions in cooperation with Australian and Japanese industrial investment. They are presently not getting start on MFP,and we examine two kinds of misunderstandings ; one is on 'enclave problem' based on rumors and suspicious, another is on how Australian news agencies had reported investment willingness of Japanese companies. The results of suggest that there existed excessive amount of complexity in the original MFP concept, and the project handling actors had failed to build a good public relationship, especially to Australian domestic new agencies.