权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A EXPERIMANTAL STUDY ON HOW TO EVALUATE SOCIAL CONSENSUS FOR PLANS TO RESOLVE SOME LOCAL PROBLEMS

如何评估解决局部问题计划的社会共识的实验研究

基本信息

批准号：
07808048
负责人：
KITANI Shinobu
金额：
$ 1.22万
依托单位：
TOHOKU UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1995
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1995 至 1997
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-07808048/
关键词：
SOCIAL DECISION SOCIAL CONCENSUS FAIRNESS HYPER-GAME LEARNING MODEL GAME THEORY 社会的公正分配的公正

项目摘要

To implement plans for resolution of problems in local societies, it is essential to make social concensus for the resolution plans in contrast with global problems. This study aims to propose a framework to evaluate a process of social consensus in veiw of a social decison process.In the first year (1995) , we had become aware of social justice to make a consensus especially in a society which consists of persons with various values. Concretely, we argue some logics of distributive justice, namely, a model of self-responsiblity and one of egalitarianism. In these models, we make a distinction between involuntary parts and self-responsible ones, and argue that former parts should only be equalized on each person.In parallel with these theoretical arguments, we construct a learning model on a hyper-game to present a process of social decision, not based upon the Bays theory but an extension learning. Using this learning model, we analyze Multi-Function Polis (MEP) project, which was aiming to develop a futuristic international city including both 'high-tech' and 'high-touch' functions in cooperation with Australian and Japanese industrial investment. They are presently not getting start on MFP,and we examine two kinds of misunderstandings ; one is on 'enclave problem' based on rumors and suspicious, another is on how Australian news agencies had reported investment willingness of Japanese companies. The results of suggest that there existed excessive amount of complexity in the original MFP concept, and the project handling actors had failed to build a good public relationship, especially to Australian domestic new agencies.

要实施解决地方社会问题的计划，必须将解决计划与全球问题进行对比，使社会共识。本研究旨在提出一个从社会决策过程的角度来评估社会共识过程的框架。在第一年（1995年），我们已经意识到社会正义，特别是在一个由具有不同价值观的人组成的社会中，达成共识。具体地说，我们论证了分配正义的一些逻辑，即一种自我负责的模式和一种平均主义的模式。在这些模型中，我们区分了非自愿部分和自我负责的部分，并认为前部分应该只在每个人身上平等。在这些理论论点的同时，我们构建了一个学习模型的超游戏，提出了一个社会决策的过程，而不是基于贝叶斯理论，而是一个扩展学习。使用这种学习模型，我们分析了多功能城市（MEP）项目，该项目旨在与澳大利亚和日本的工业投资合作，开发一个包括“高科技”和“高接触”功能的未来国际城市。他们目前还没有开始对MFP，我们检查两种误解;一种是基于谣言和怀疑的“飞地问题”，另一种是澳大利亚新闻机构如何报道日本企业的投资意愿。研究结果表明，在最初的MFP概念中存在过多的复杂性，项目处理行为者未能建立良好的公共关系，特别是对澳大利亚国内的新机构。