权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

THE HISTORIOAL RESEARCH ON THE HAN * CONFUCIANISM

汉史研究*儒家思想

基本信息

批准号：
09610370
负责人：
FUKUI Shigemasa
金额：
$ 1.28万
依托单位：
Waseda University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09610370/
关键词：
Chinese history Han dynasty Confucianism Tung Chung-shu Erudites of the five classics Pan Ku, The History of Fornes Han 童仲〓菫仲舒班国『漢書』中国漢代歴史

项目摘要

The results of reseach corried out for three years are summerized as follws.I. The reexamination of Dong Znorgshu *** II The fundamental studies on yontie-lun *** (Debates on Salt and Han). III The reonsideration of Ban (Ru ** ord his book, Han-shu (The History of the Former Han).First, the investigater inquires into Dong's memorials to the Emperor Wu and,through restoring the forms of official documents of Han times, he orgues that the whole parts of Duice ** can not De regarded as his origical memorials, At the same time, after attempting to compare the two different biographies of Dong in Shiji ** and Han-shu, no idoubts that the standard opinion which syas that Dong contributed greatly the establishment of confucianism as a state doctrine.Second, by analizing the disussions recorded in Yantie-lun, the investigator argues that this source reflects the political struggle between the officials belonging to the "Inner" and "Outer" court of the day respectively and the intellectual conflict between the two groups of thought, confucionism and Legalism. Consequently he comes to a conclusion that the viotory of confucianism and defeat of Legalism result in makine the first step toward the foundation of confucianism as the national thought.Third. The investigator clarifies that the outhor of Han-shu owes his own personal beliefs consisted of four phroses, (1). The Han dynasty descended from Yao, (2). The Han dynasty is characterized by the"Fire Element **", (3) Zuoghuan,"**", (4) Weishyu **. And he asserted that all of these views formed and prevailed during the days of the end of the Former Han. From this point of view, he concludes, that the famous and accepted opinion about the Hon Confuiclanism is "falsed" by Ban Bu who compiled Han-shu based on his unustual and unorthodoxical views above mentioned.

本文总结了三年来的研究成果。《董仲舒》再考（二）《盐汉之辨》基础研究第三章对禁令的反思《汉书》一书中，首先考察了董仲舒的奏折，通过还原汉代公文的格式，认为《杜诗》的全部内容不能作为董仲舒的奏折，同时，通过对《史记》和《汉书》中关于董仲舒的两篇传记的比较，并不认为董仲舒对儒学作为一种国家学说的确立作出了重大贡献。本文认为，这一来源反映了当时“内”、“外”朝官员之间的政治斗争和儒法两大思想派别之间的思想冲突。由此得出结论：儒家的灭亡和法家的失败，使儒家作为国家思想的基础迈出了第一步。研究者阐明，《汉书》的作者有自己的个人信仰，包括四个短语：（1）。汉朝是姚的后裔，（2）。汉代的特点是“火元素 **”，（3）左环，“**”，（4）卫水 **。他断言，所有这些观点都是在前汉末形成并盛行的。从这一点出发，他得出结论，著名的和公认的关于儒家学说的意见是“伪造”的班布谁编写的《汉书》根据他的unustual和非正统的意见，上述。