Inductive Research for Inzen and Rinji through Exhausetive Inspection.

1.本研究项目的对象是仁善和林二。仁善是前皇帝的信，仁治是皇帝的信。这两份文件通常都是由其最亲密的同事撰写和签署的。2.3 982份仁善和麟二样本已从四种资源中收集。第一名：镰仓伊布和平安伊布。第二个：Kotei zoho Tendai Zasu ki，Dai-Nipon Bukkyo Zensho（Vol.37/39 Asaba-sho，Vol.45-49/51 Kakuzen-sho，Vol.128 Kacho-yoryaku Monshu-den），Zoho Shiryo Taisei（Vol.12-15 Chuyuki，Vol.17 Choshuki，Vol.21 Hyohanki，Vol.24/25 Taiki，Vol.29-30 Kikki）and Gyokuyo.第三，东京大学历史研究所拍摄的照片.第四，东京大学历史研究所提供的历史文献数据库.近藤争论关于仁善和仁济的一般问题。远藤研究了Sessho Migyosho，而Bense研究了Goin Migyosho。Sessho Migyosho和Coin Migyosho与Inzen和Rinji有共同的特征。本乡惠子研究的是中光行寺编纂的《御吉书庵》，延部研究的是宽路寺家族编纂的《临济宗府庵》。《御吉庵》和《临济宗赋庵》是关于仁济的经典著作。

1. The objects of this research project are Inzen and Rinji. Inzen is the Ex-emperor's letter and Rinji is the Emperor's letter. Both of them were usually written and signed by their closest associates.2.3,982 samples of Inzen and Rinji have been collected from the four kinds of resources. First : Kamakura Ibun and Heian Ibun. Second : Kotei-zoho Tendai Zasu ki, Dai-Nipon Bukkyo Zensho (Vol.37/39 Asaba-sho, Vol.45-49/51 Kakuzen-sho, Vol.128 Kacho-yoryaku Monshu-den), Zoho Shiryo Taisei (Vol.12-15 Chuyuki, Vol.17 Choshuki, Vol.21 Hyohanki, Vol.24/25 Taiki, Vol.29-30 Kikki) and Gyokuyo. Third : photographs taken by the Historiographical Institute the University of Tokyo. Fourth : The Database of the Historical Documents provided by the Historiographical Institute the University of Tokyo.3. Kondo argued about the general questions about Inzen and Rinji.4. Endo studied about Sessho Migyosho, while Banse studied about Goin Migyosho. Sessho Migyosho and Coin Migyosho have common characters with Inzen and Rinji.5. Hongo Keiko studied about the Migyosho-an compiled by Kadenokoji Nakamitsu, while Yanbe studied about the Fuan of Rinji compiled by the Kanroji Family. The Migyosho-an and the Fuan of Rinji are the classical compilations about Inzen and Rinji.