Cezanne's Reception in Japan during 1930s-'40s

在-90(A)科学研究补助金的资助下进行的研究中，我全面调查了从1910年代到1921年12月的美术杂志，并构建了关于塞尚的论文和文件的图表。根据1998-2001年教育部科学研究资助计划(CX2)，我对1922年1月至1947年1月的美术杂志进行了彻底的查阅，收集了关于塞尚的论文，然后对这些文本进行了仔细的研究和整理。我将这本论文分为三个部分：(1)1922年1月至1929年12月，(2)1930年1月至1939年12月，(3)1940年1月至1947年1月。在每一本书中，我根据论据的观点对论文进行分类，并为每一块准备参考书目。为了在更大的背景下把握塞尚的接受，我准备了一张图表，展示了法国现代艺术的接受历史。我调查的结果是，在…在20世纪30年代和40年代，“塑形”(Zokei)和“现实主义”(Shajitsu)成为解释塞尚在日本占主导地位的关键词。到目前为止，这一点一直是完全不清楚的，正是新的知识使本研究具有原创性我写了一篇关于我对这两种解释的兴起的文章。在研究期间，我计划了三场与本研究主题相关的讲座：2000年7月21日，我邀请了独立行政机构东京国立文化财产研究所艺术部第二部分主任田中敦先生就“日本现代艺术史上的研究课题”发表演讲；2001年7月28日，我还邀请国际日本研究中心稻贺茂美教授就“莫里斯·丹尼斯与日本”这一主题发表了演讲；2000年9月22日，我邀请了德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校艺术与艺术史系的理查德·斯尼夫教授和现代主义研究中心主任就“现代艺术中的数字体验”这一主题发表演讲。我不再保守秘密，而是把这项研究展示给其他对类似研究课题感兴趣的研究人员，并创造了一个着眼于公共利益的讨论场所。我记录了这三个人的演讲，并将其与参考书目、年表和我自己的文章一起发表在一本研究结果报告小册子(A4尺寸，100页)中，并将本研究的结果展示给许多其他研究人员。较少

In my research conducted under the auspices of the Scientific Research Grants for 1989-90(A), I comprehensively surveyed fine arts magazines from the 1910s through December of 1921 and constructed a chart of the essays and documents on Cezanne. Under the 1998-2001 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Subsidy for Aiding Scientific Research (CX2) I thoroughly reviewed fine arts magazines dating from January 1922 to January 1947, collected the essays on Cezanne, and then pored over and organized these texts. I classified this body of essays into three blocks : (1) January 1922 - December 1929, (2) January 1930 -December 1939, and (3) January 1940- January 1947. In each I classified the essays based on the points of their arguments and prepared bibliographical notes for each block. In order to grasp Cezanne's reception in a larger context, I prepared a chart showing the history of the reception of French modern art.As a result of my survey, it became clear that in … More the 1930s and 1940s, "plastique" (zokei) and "realism" (shajitsu) become dominant as keywords in the interpretation of Cezanne in Japan. Until now, this was a point that had been completely unclear, and it is new knowledge that makes the present research original I have composed an essay concerning me rise of both interpretations. During the research period, I planned three lectures related to the theme of the present research : I asked Mr. Atsushi Tanaka, Director of the Second Section of the Art Department at the independent administrative institution National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Tokyo to speak on the subject "Research Topics in the History of Reception in Japanese Modern Art" on July 21^<th>, 2000 ; I also asked Professor Shigemi Inaga of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies to speak on the topic "Maurice Denis and Japan" on Jury 28^<th>, 2001 ; and I asked Professor Richard Sniff of the Department of Art and Art History at the University of Texas at Austin and Director of the Center for the Study of Modernism to speak on the topic "Digital ; Experience in Modern Art" on September 22^<nd>, 2000. Instead of keeping it to myself, I presented the research to other researchers with interests in similar research topics and created a place for discussion with an eye towards public benefit.I recorded and published the talks given by these three individuals with a bibliography, chronology and my own essay in a research results report booklet (A4 size, 100 pages) and presented the results of the present research to numerous other researchers. Less