Cezanne interpretation in Japan in 1930's-40's and its intellectual Environment

1930-40年代日本的塞尚诠释及其思想环境

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    15520086
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 1.22万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    日本
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
  • 财政年份:
    2003
  • 资助国家:
    日本
  • 起止时间:
    2003 至 2004
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

In 1930s and 1940s Japan, the French painter Paul Cezanne (1839-1906) was interpreted using the critical terms "shajitsu" (realism) and Zokei (plastic) in Japanese.This research aims to clarify their intellectual environments.With regard to shajitsu, I exlored the development of the Kyoto School centered on Nishida Kitaro as one of the backgrounds of this criticism. In the 1930s, Nishida had abandoned the analysis of the subject's pure consciousness and was analyzing the subject's actions in relation to the environment that surrounded the subject. One could say that in place of subject theory he pursued the discussion of subject-environment theory. Nishida's followers Miki Kiyoshi, Ueda Juzo and Kimura Motomori also participated in this discussion and the efforts of each bore abundant fruit. The perceptual system of the realist criticism that focused on the relationship between subject and environment was a critical movement that was subsumed by the philosophical development of the con … More temporary Kyoto School, which at that time, was beginning to explain the subject by introducing the aspect of the environment. In the second place, the Kyoto School attempted to explain the dialectical relationship between the subject and the environment, with Miki using the "imagination" and Kimura using the mechanism of "expression" We can say that the development of this sort of theorization of creative action was a major conceptual framework that existed simultaneously with the realist criticism that attended to the act of "modeling" whereby reality was copied.Conerning Zokei, therein are two frameworks. First, there is the Western theory of abstract art formed in the 1930s by Herbert Read (1893-1968) and Alfred H Barr Jr., in which abstract art obtained "citizenship", and these works were introduced to Japan by Saburo Hasegawa (1906-1957) and Shuzo Takiguchi (1903-1979). Thereby, this faction of abstract art theory spread throughout Japan as well. Secondly, there was the passionate advocacy of "aesthetics of machine" in Japan at the same time, which was behind the growth and spread of the theory of abstract art. The Cezanne criticism of "plastic" fell within these two frameworks, and can be summed up as the nature of acceptance fomented by this view of modern life. Less
在20世纪30、40年代的日本,法国画家保罗·塞尚(Paul Cezanne,1839-1906)被用日本的“写实主义”(shajitsu)和“造型主义”(Zokei)等批评术语来解读,本文旨在厘清他们的思想环境。关于“写实主义”,笔者将以西田喜多郎为中心的京都画派的发展作为这一批评的背景之一。在1930年代,西田已经放弃了对主体纯粹意识的分析,而是分析主体与周围环境的关系。人们可以说,他追求的是主体环境理论的讨论,而不是主体理论。西田的追随者三木清、上田十三和木村元森也参与了这次讨论,每个人的努力都结出了丰硕的成果。现实主义批评的感性体系关注主体与环境的关系,是一场被现实主义哲学发展所包容的批评运动。 ...更多信息 临时京都学校,当时,开始通过介绍环境方面来解释这个问题。其次,京都学派试图解释主体与环境的辩证关系,三木使用“想象”,木村使用“表达”的机制。我们可以说,这种创造性行为理论化的发展是一个主要的概念框架,它与关注“建模”行为的现实主义批评同时存在。由此现实被复制。Conerning Zokei,there are two frameworks框架.首先是赫伯特·里德(1893-1968)和小阿尔弗雷德·H·巴尔在20世纪30年代形成的西方抽象艺术理论,这些作品由长谷川三郎(1906-1957)和泷口修三(1903-1979)引进日本。因此,这一派的抽象艺术理论也传遍了整个日本。其次,抽象艺术理论的成长和传播背后,是日本国内同时存在的“机器美学”的热烈倡导,塞尚对“造型”的批评也在这两个框架内,可以归结为这种现代生活观所催生的接受性。少

项目成果

期刊论文数量(22)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
永井隆則: "モダン・アート論再考"思文閣出版. 1-288 (2004)
永井刚典:“重新思考现代艺术理论”Shibunkaku Publishing 1-288(2004)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
Reconsidering Modern Art theory-From the pespective of The logic of practice
重新思考现代艺术理论——实践逻辑的视角
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2004
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Stella ZHIVKOVA;ITO Nobuhiro;ITO Nobuhiro;Takanori Nagai;ITO Nobuhiro;永井隆則;ITO Nobuhiro;Takanori Nagai
  • 通讯作者:
    Takanori Nagai
永井隆則: "写実のセザンヌ受容"人文. 52(未定). (2004)
Takanori Nagai:“现实主义中塞尚的接受”52(待定)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
「写実」のセザンヌ受容とその思想環境
塞尚对“现实主义”的接受及其思想环境
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2004
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    加藤尚武 編;伊東多佳子;他;イエルク・トレーガー(翻訳);田中淳;TANAKA Atsushi;永井隆則;田中淳;Takanori Nagai;永井隆則;ITO Nobuhiro;伊東信宏;永井隆則
  • 通讯作者:
    永井隆則
Cezanne reception from Shajitsu and the intellectual environment
塞尚对社实的接受和知识环境
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2004
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    ステラ・ジブコバ;伊東信宏;永井隆則;Takanori Nagai
  • 通讯作者:
    Takanori Nagai
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

NAGAI Takanori其他文献

NAGAI Takanori的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('NAGAI Takanori', 18)}}的其他基金

General research on Cezanne's theory of art
塞尚艺术理论综述
  • 批准号:
    15K02108
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.22万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
The Idea of the anti-modernism in Cezanne
塞尚的反现代主义思想
  • 批准号:
    24652021
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.22万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research
Cezanne's Reception in Japan during 1930s-'40s
1930 年代至 40 年代塞尚在日本的接待情况
  • 批准号:
    10610053
  • 财政年份:
    1998
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.22万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了