International Publicness and Cultural Imperialism

国际公共性与文化帝国主义

• 批准号: 10620027
• 负责人: ONUMA Yasuaki
• 金额: $ 2.05万
• 依托单位: The University of Tokyo
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1998
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1998 至 1999
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-10620027/
• 关键词: international publicness; cultural imperialism; intereivilizational approach to human rights; multiculturalism; public and private; international law; globalization; universality; アメリカニズム

1. The research results of this project are quite manifold due to its extensive relevance to many fields of studies. The important points can he summarized as follows.2-1. The concept of 'human rights' that has been deemed as the core of the 'international public value', was actually the product of specific political and cultural situation, that is, it was formulated in the modern Western society. The present approach to human rights is not immune from this kind of Western bias, and as alternative point of view which will enable argument concerning the content of human rights an intercivilizational approach is proposed.2-2. Multilateral analysis of the 'publicness' was attempted, taking into consideration the above mentioned intercivilizational approach, Through examining the works on the subject written by J. Habermas, specific feature of his argument which is applicable only to the modern Europe was pointed out. Still, at the same time, we should not overlook the possibility or devel … More oping his argument critically beyond its limit and transform it into universal one.2-3. Keeping this point in mind, in order to evaluate the possibility of universalizing the concept of 'publicness', a comparative study of the relevant concept in the traditional non-Western societies was pursued. This study provided us with the assumption that it is the orientation toward the 'universal' form that is important as a specific feature of the modern Western civilization.2-4. As a result of these studios, an issue concerning the concept of 'cultural imperialism' reveals itself. The 'globalization' of the Western culture (typically, Americanization) is not a mere consequence of the Western political and economical dominance, rather it is deeply connected with the inclination toward universality inherent in the Western culture. The necessity for studying this specific element of 'universalism' was realized.2-5. For example, 'law' is accompanied with the element of 'universality' but the 'rule of law' is not necessarily a universal method. The necessity for reconstructing the universally acceptable concept of 'international law' was pointed out.3. The two-year joint research has brought about many profitable results while it also reveals as many a problem unresolved. Further research on these problems shall be undertaken. Less

1. 该项目的研究成果非常广泛，因为它与许多研究领域具有广泛的相关性。其要点可概括如下：2-1．被视为“国际公共价值”核心的“人权”概念，实际上是特定政治文化情境的产物，即在近代西方社会中形成的。当前的人权方法也不能免受这种西方偏见的影响，并且作为能够就人权内容进行争论的替代观点，提出了一种跨文明方法。2-2。考虑到上述跨文明方法，尝试对“公共性”进行多边分析。通过考察哈贝马斯关于该主题的著作，指出了他的论点仅适用于现代欧洲的具体特征。尽管如此，与此同时，我们不应该忽视这种可能性，也不应该发展他的论点，批判性地超越其限制，并将其转化为普遍的论点。2-3。考虑到这一点，为了评估“公共性”概念普遍化的可能性，对传统非西方社会中的相关概念进行了比较研究。这项研究为我们提供了这样的假设：作为现代西方文明的一个特殊特征，“普遍”形式的取向是很重要的。2-4。这些工作室的结果是，“文化帝国主义”概念的问题暴露出来。西方文化的“全球化”（典型的是美国化）不仅仅是西方政治和经济主导地位的结果，而且与西方文化固有的普遍性倾向密切相关。认识到研究“普遍主义”这一特定要素的必要性。2-5．例如，“法律”带有“普遍性”的要素，但“法治”不一定是普遍的方法。指出了重建普遍接受的“国际法”概念的必要性。 3．为期两年的联合研究带来了许多有益的成果，但也揭示了许多尚未解决的问题。这些问题还有待进一步研究。较少的

项目成果

新田一郎: "日本中世の紛争処理の構図"歴史学研究会(編)『紛争と訴訟の文化史』(青木書店). 69-100 (2000)

新田一郎：“中世纪日本的争端解决结构”，史学研究小组（编辑），争端和诉讼文化史（青木书店）69-100（2000）。

大沼保昭: "文際的人権論の構築に向けて-欧米中心的人権論の克服による人権の普遍化-"国家学会雑誌. 111-9.10. 1-57 (1998)

Yasuaki Onuma：“构建跨文化人权理论——克服以西方为中心的人权理论，实现人权的普遍化”，《美国国家科学院杂志》111-9.10（1998）。

大沼保昭: "Towards an Intercivilizational Approach to Human Rights"J. Bauer & D. Bell eds. "The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights" (Cambridge University Press). 103-123 (1999)

Yasuaki Onuma：“迈向人权的跨文明方法”J. Bauer 和 D. Bell 编辑，“东亚人权挑战”（剑桥大学出版社）103-123（1999 年）。

大沼保昭: "文際的人権論の構築に向けて-欧米中心的人権論の克服による人権の普遍化-"国家学会雑誌. 111-3・4. 1-24 (1998)

Yasuaki Onuma：“构建跨文学的人权理论 - 通过克服以西方为中心的人权理论实现人权的普遍化 -”《美国国家科学院学报》，111-3, 4. 1-24 (1998)。

新田一郎: "「中世の公共性」論をめぐって"歴史評論. 596. 46-55 (1999)

新田一郎：“论‘中世纪公共性’理论”历史评论 596. 46-55 (1999)。