日・米・英企業の目標と行動様式:1955-90年-グレンジャーおよびゲーム・モデルによる分析-

首先，我们比较了英国、日本和美国公司行为模式的差异。其次，我们还分析了各国公司的目标。第三，我们将目标和行为模式联系起来。从审查中得出的命题与一般民众的陈述大不相同。此外，我们还展示了每个国家的哪个利益相关者实现了他们的效用，以及谁的目标更重要。根据这些结果，每个国家的“谁是公司”与人们所认为的不同。有一些重要的保留意见。在本分析中，我们假设东道国利益相关者的效用是公司的目标。然而，我们必须考虑到以下几点。东道国利益相关者可以追求自己的目标，并可以最大化其分配。他可以选择负分配，可以利他地行事，可以追求一些宏伟的想法而不考虑自己的利益。其他利益相关者试图实现他们自己的效用。东道国利益相关者的行为不一定是为了实现自己的利益最大化，而其他利益相关者在很多情况下必须实现自己的利益最大化。我们必须考虑各种模型来解释这两个过程何时同时发生。

First, we demonstrated the differences in the behavior patterns of companies across Britain, Japan, and America conparatively. Second, we also analysed the goals of companies across countries. Third, we correlated the goals and the behavior patterns. The propositions resulted from the examination differed much from the statements by the populace at large. Also, we have demonstrated which stakeholder of each country attained their utilities, and whose goals were attached more importance. By these results, "who is the company" in each country, is different from what have been believed.There are some important reservations. In this analysis, we have assumed the utilities of the host stakeholders as the goals of companies. However, we have to take into account of the following points. A host stakeholder can pursue its own goals, and can maximise its distribution. He can choose negative distribution, can behave altruistically, and can pursue some grandiose ideas without taking into account of his own interests. The other stakeholders try to realize their own utilities. The host stakeholder does not necessarily behave to maximise his interests, while the other stakeholders in many cases have to maximise their own interests. We have to think about various models which can explain when these two processes occurred simultaneously.