权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Study on Social Possibility of "Assembly Method of Community Building" for Revitalizing Local Communities

“社区建设的组装方式”振兴地方社区的社会可能性研究

基本信息

批准号：
11610208
负责人：
MORITAN AKIO
金额：
$ 2.3万
依托单位：
Tokyo Keizai University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This paper reports on a case study of the assembly method of community building as a tool for revitalizing local communities. The Nodahokubu district in Kobe-City was heavily damaged by the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake of 1995. After the Earthquake, a part of the district was planned to reconstruct by a land readjustment project implemented by the City of Kobe. In the rest of the district, the City helped the residents to reconstruct their neighborhoods through housing environmental improvement projects. The residents also decided to introduce district planning into these areas. In all neighborhoods of the district, the reconstruction plans were implemented by neighborhood assembly consisting of local residents. In this paper, we will examine how this assembly performed.The inhabitants are asked to agree and must build consensus. In general, it is difficult. However, in Nodahokubu, they agreed smoothly. The inhabitants derived various ideas from their activities and carried out them in a local park and alleys. We define these activities as "program practice". The inhabitants come to think that a park and alleys belong to themselves. They realize such space as "Commons". The inhabitants reinforce mutual bonds. A base making to reach an agreement is done in this way. This agreement was not something like a Social Contract. It is rightly "Local Governance". This assembly accumulates a negotiating power that makes them able to bargain with the authorities. A boundary line of "practical closed sphere" appears here.In this district, the assembly continues community building after the reconstruction. This assembly of community building make comprehensive network between various area organizations. It is going to undertake the trifling local problem in this area. We call this network a "community alliance".

本文报告了社区建设作为振兴当地社区的工具的集合方法的案例研究。神户市的Nodahokubu区在1995年的阪神-Awaji大地震中遭到严重破坏。地震发生后，神户市实施了土地整理项目，计划重建该地区的一部分。在该地区的其他地区，该市通过住房环境改善项目帮助居民重建社区。居民们还决定将地区规划引入这些地区。在该地区的所有社区，重建计划都通过由当地居民组成的邻里会议来实施。在这篇文章中，我们将研究这次大会是如何进行的。要求居民同意并必须建立共识。总体而言，这是困难的。然而，在Nodahokubu，他们顺利达成了一致。居民们从他们的活动中获得了各种想法，并在当地的公园和胡同里进行了实践。我们将这些活动定义为“计划实践”。居民开始认为公园和小巷是属于他们自己的。他们意识到这样的空间就是“公地”。居民们加强了相互之间的联系。达成协议的基础工作就是这样做的。这份协议不像是一份社会契约。它理所当然地被称为“地方治理”。这个议会积累了谈判能力，使他们能够与当局讨价还价。这里出现了一条“实际封闭的球体”的界线。在这个地区，议会在重建后继续进行社区建设。这种社区建设的集合，使各地区组织之间形成了全面的网络。它将承担这一地区微不足道的局部问题。我们称这个网络为“社区联盟”。