权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Psychological study of statement analysis of confession

口供陈述分析的心理学研究

基本信息

批准号：
11620067
负责人：
HAMADA Sumio
金额：
$ 0.32万
依托单位：
Hanazono University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

We investigated the confession process of two murder cases, Yakai case and Niho case, which happened in Yamaguchi Prefecture in 1951 and 1954, and found that the apology-demanding attitude of interrogators had brought forth false confesions in both cases. Especially in Niho case the recording tapes of interrogating process turned out to be very important materials for us to recognize that the interrogator often take such attitude and force a false confession from the suspect, who is obliged to tell a criminal story under the stress of interrogation as if he were a real culprit. In Japan the criminal investigators have an inclination to interrogate the suspect again and again to get their desired answer, so the resulted story is often a kind of joint work between the innocent defendant and the interrogator. However sometimes the court can not see into this mechanism of false confession and deliver wrong judgments. The criminal court in Japan can be compared to a magnetic field, where the prosecutor's story attracts the judge's judicial decisions like a magnet. We must make a searching inquiry into this dynamic field of the court.

本文通过对1951年和1954年发生在山口县的两起杀人案--八井案和二保案的口供过程进行考察，发现在这两起案件中，由于审讯人员要求道歉的态度，导致了虚假口供的产生。特别是在二保案中，讯问过程的录音带成为我们认识到侦查人员经常采取这种态度，强迫犯罪嫌疑人作虚假供述，迫使犯罪嫌疑人在讯问的压力下讲出一个犯罪故事，就好像他是一个真实的罪犯一样的重要材料。在日本，刑事调查人员倾向于反复审问嫌疑人以获得他们想要的答案，因此所产生的故事往往是无辜的被告和罪犯之间的一种联合工作。但有时法院无法洞察这种虚假供述的机制，做出错误的判决。日本的刑事法院可以比作一个磁场，检察官的故事像磁铁一样吸引着法官的司法判决。我们必须对法院这个充满活力的领域进行彻底的调查。