权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Biographical Study of Lafcadio Hearn's Letters to Joseph Tunison

拉夫卡迪奥·赫恩致约瑟夫·图尼森信件的传记研究

基本信息

批准号：
12610578
负责人：
UMEMOTO Junko
金额：
$ 0.64万
依托单位：
College of International Relations, Nihon University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

I have received unpublished letters of Joseph Tunison, Henry Krehbiel, Alexander Hill, Elizabeth Bisland Wetmore, George Gould, Henry Watkin and so on in addition to Lafcadio Hearn's. Using these letters, I traced the struggl between Hearn's friends, who competed against each other in order to be the first in the field of Hearn's biography. They were Watkin (represented by Milton Bronner), Gould and Bisland. Bisland won the position as Hearn's official biographer, and published. The Life and Letters of Lafcadio Heam in 1906. However, Watkin published Letters from the Raven consisting of Hearn's letters he got, and Gould followed Watkin with Concerning Lafcadio Hearn, First of all, I compared Bisland's biography with Watkin's, and discussed why and how Bisland was elected in such a severe struggle, how the other people felt toward her work, and how they contributed to her work by using the letters written by Hearn's friends, and clarified why Tunison and Krehbiel were so afraid of having Watkin's book circulated. In the next stage, I traced the process of Gould's completing his biography by analyzing the letters exchanged between Gould and such acquaintances of Hearn as Tunison and Alexander Hill, the latter of which had been a good adviser to Hearn's friends when they sought information and materials related to Hearn during his years in Cincinnati. Gould's work caused a heated controversy among Hearn's ojd friends, due to the clinical and critical way he treated Hearn's character.

除了拉夫卡迪奥·赫恩的信外，我还收到了约瑟夫·突尼斯、亨利·克雷比尔、亚历山大·希尔、伊丽莎白·比斯兰·韦特莫尔、乔治·古尔德、亨利·沃特金等人未发表的信。通过这些信件，我追溯了赫恩朋友之间的斗争，他们为了成为赫恩传记领域的第一人而相互竞争。他们是沃特金（由米尔顿·布朗纳代表）、古尔德和比岛。Bisland获得了赫恩官方传记作者的职位，并出版了。1906年的《拉夫卡迪奥·希姆的生平和书信》。然而，沃特金出版了由他收到的赫恩的信件组成的《乌鸦的来信》，古尔德随后又出版了《关于拉夫卡蒂奥·赫恩》。首先，我将比斯兰的传记与沃特金的传记进行了比较，讨论了比斯兰在如此激烈的斗争中为什么以及如何当选，其他人对她的工作的看法，以及他们如何利用赫恩朋友的信件为她的工作做出贡献，并澄清了为什么Tunison和Krehbiel如此害怕沃特金的书流传。在下一阶段，我通过分析古尔德与赫恩的熟人，如Tunison和Alexander Hill之间的信件往来，追踪了古尔德完成传记的过程。在赫恩在辛辛那提的那些年里，当赫恩的朋友们在寻找与赫恩有关的信息和材料时，后者一直是赫恩的好顾问。古尔德的作品在候恩的朋友中引起了激烈的争论，因为他对待候恩角色的方式是临床和批判的。