PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTS OF SURESVARA AND BHARTRPRAPANCA BASED ON PHILOLOGICAL STUDIES OF SANSKRIT TEXTS AND MANUSCRIPTS

商羯罗是八世纪吠檀多的创始人，据说是印度有史以来最伟大的哲学家。这是因为他的无限婆罗门一元论是泛印度教思想。后来的吠檀多教师因其独特性（以及他们的新学校）而脱颖而出，与商羯罗有所不同，尽管印度教的宗教派别一般已经发展了介绍巴克提和坦陀罗。对后商羯罗宗教史的研究在过去三十年中取得了显著的发展。但是对商羯罗或前商羯罗吠檀多的研究却被忽视了。因为Prof.H。中村的《吠檀多哲学的发展》（1955年），我们只有两篇论文给出了前商羯罗吠檀多的总体前景，即S.L.Pandey的《前商羯罗吠檀多哲学》（第209-228页，1974年）和a.j.a alston的《吠檀多的方法》（第213-259页，1989年）。现在，《梵经》是最重要的《奥义书》之一，因为它涉及了摩诃瓦……更多的kyas，如《亚罕布茹阿玛斯米》，《梵经》，因此，商羯罗的《梵经》和菩萨的《梵经》也被认为是重要的作品。Bhartrprapanca是Advaita吠檀多的拮抗剂，也是Brhadaranyakopanisad的另一个Bhasya的作者。尤其是在苏瑞斯瓦拉的《瓦尔蒂卡》中，他通常被称为竞争对手。（他也是前商羯罗吠檀多历史上的一个伟大人物，被称为jnanakarmasamuccayavadin。）由于他的著作无论是印刷形式还是手稿都没有在我们手中，因此依靠他自己的作品来重建他的哲学思想是不可能的。收集别人著作中的参考文献是唯一可行的方法。该调查员计划完成苏雷斯瓦拉的《Vartika》的完整翻译并收集参考资料。在翻译的过程中，研究者注意到，Anandagiri对《Vartika》的评论Sastraprakasika提到了Bhartrprapanca的《Bhasya》，并发现其中有许多提到了Bhartrprapanca的思想。可以肯定的是，阿南达基里在写《萨特拉普拉西卡》的时候手头上有同样的巴西亚。因此，这位研究者决定寻找一份《巴夏》的手稿。然而，尽管尽了一切可能的努力，这位研究者还是没能找到一份手稿。此外，依靠零散的碎片来重建Bhartrprapanca的哲学思想确实是一项艰巨的任务，因此仍在进行中。在这种情况下，在Suresvara的Vartika中发现的Bhartrprapanca在报告中提出。少

Sankara, the founder of Advaita Vedanta, of the 8th century is said to be the greatest philosopher ever produced in India. This is because his monism of the limitless Brahman is the pan-Hindu thought. Later Vedanta teachers stood out due to their uniquenesses (and those of their new schools) in fining differences from Sankara, though Hindu sects of religion in general have developed introducing Bhakti and Tantrism. This research of the post-Sankara History of religion has made a remarkable development in the last three decades. But the study of Sankara or pre-Sankara Vedanta has been rather neglected. Since Prof.H.Nakamura's The Development of Vedanta Philosophy (1955), we have only two treatises giving a general outlook of pre-Sankara Vedanta, i.e. S.L.Pandey's Pre-Sankara Advaita Philosophy, (pp.209-228, 1974) and A.J.Alston's (trans) The Method of the Vedanta (pp.213-259, 1989). Now the Brhadaranyakopanisad is among the most important Upanisads, as is known from its involving Mahava … More kyas like aham brahmasmi, tat tvam asi, and therefore Sankara's Bhasya and Suresvara's Vartika of the same are also regarded as important works.Bhartrprapanca is an antagonist of Advaita Vedanta and is the author of the other Bhasya of the Brhadaranyakopanisad. In Suresvara's Vartika in particular, he is mostly referred as a rival discussant. (He was also a great figure in the pre-Sankara Vedanta history and is known as jnanakarmasamuccayavadin.) Because none of his writings are in our hands either in printed form or in manuscripts, it has been impossible to reconstruct his philosophical thoughts taking recourse to his own works. Collecting references found in the writings of others is the only possible way to procedd.This investigator planned to produce a complete translation of Suresvara's Vartika and to collect references. While translating the same the investigator noticed that Sastraprakasika, the commentrary on the Vartika by Anandagiri, referred to Bhartrprapanca's Bhasya, and found that there were many references to Bhartrprapanca's ideas thoughts in it. It is certain that Anandagiri had the same Bhasya to hand while he was writing Sastraprakasika. Therefore this investigator decided to search out a manuscript of the Bhasya.However, despite every possible effort, this investigator could not discover a manuscript. Also the reconstruction of the philosophical thought of Bhartrprapanca depending on scattered fragments was really a mammoth task, and is therefore still under way. Under the circumstances references to Bhartrprapanca found in Suresvara's Vartika are herewith presented in the report. Less