Study on the interrelationship and the social change of Ancient Korea and Japan from the view of burial goods

建立古代年表，探讨朝鲜、三国与日本的相互关系是当务之急。根据考古学家的说法，现在我们对他估计的日期有很大的差距。为了解决这个问题，我比较了墓丘上的陶器，并研究了类型的变化。在此基础上，首先对比韩国三国考古时期的历史，对日本考古时期的开始进行了研究。我强烈指出，日本受到朝鲜的影响不亚于中国。由于与中国的特殊关系，日本的建国比朝鲜更为突兀。当时，探戈和日本沿海的其他地区发挥了巨大的作用。直到5世纪中叶，卡亚和九州北部地区一直是朝鲜和日本互动的轴心。但在同一时间之后，另一场溃败开始集中在百杰区和东高区之间。我们从墓室的反面了解到这一点。在朝鲜半岛每个王国的墓葬物品语料库上，我可以找到一些重要的观点。在前5世纪和5世纪中叶，韩国和日本都发生了一次金属加工的大变革。而在前6世纪，出现了新的名品浪潮，新秩序是由中国建立的。

It is urgent to build up the ancient chronology to discuss about the interrelationship between Korea three kingdoms and Japan. Now we have wide gaps of he estimated dates according to archaeologists. To resolve it, I compared the pottery from burial mounds and study the typological changes. After doing so, I have got the common base to date each burial mounds and burial goods.On this preparation, I first researched the starting of the Japanese Kofun period in the contrast of the three kingdoms of Korea. I strongly pointed out that Japan had big effect from Korea no less than from China. The Japan state formation was more abrupt than Korea on behalf of the special relationship with China. At that time Tango and other districts on the Japanese sea coast played a great role. Until the mid 5^<th> century, Kaya and the northern Kyusyu district was an axis of interaction of Korea and Japan. But after the same time another rout began to be focused between Baekje and Higo district.. We Know it from the contrary of burial chambers.On the corpus of burial goods of each kingdom in the Korean peninsula, I could find out some important points. An big metal work's change occurred all at once in the former and mid 5^<th> century both in Korea and in Japan. And in the former 6^<th> century, new wave of prestige goods appeared and the new order was builty by China.