权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Sexual Love as Viewed from the Standpoint of Japanese Interpretation of Life in Interdisciplinary and Historical Perspective

从跨学科和历史视角的日本人生命解释的角度看性爱

基本信息

批准号：
13610694
负责人：
SUZUKI Sadami
金额：
$ 1.09万
依托单位：
INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR JAPANESE STUDIES
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

It is generally said that the "view of sexual love" is changed from sanctity t to brutality in modern times in Japan. Researching to reformulations of "view of sexual love" in the perspective of "view of life", we can clarify that it has to be said that the both of sanctity and brutality have been exist side by side and made complexity from Tokugawa period to contemporary Japan, although these both has been changed in Meiji era. When we watch from the idea in Japanese myth to pornographies, the both clearly existed in Tokugawa period. And the reformulation of "view of life" influenced by biology and evolutionism in Meiji generalized the notion of "sexual love" by biological instinct. Although it is said that the feature of reception of biological evolutionism in Japan is the confusion with social evolutionism, that confusion also occurred in Europe especially in America. In Japan these both evolutionisms looked as the theory of "heaven", and that is the feature in Japan. And the notion of "sexual love" by biological instinct was looked as brutality and wide spread by "naturalism" in Japanese literature, but was looked as sanctity of act of "universal life" and spread by the "life-centrism" movement. Standing on this "life-centrism," Kuriyagawa Hakuson insisted the sanctity of sexual love to be turn from the brutality in modern notion reformed from sanctity in the ancient and medieval age. This historical perspective by Kuriagawa Hakuson was spread and became as general notion. In the fact, those both of the "view of sexual love" has been existed after the Kuriagawa's discriptin to contemporary Japan.

一般认为，近代日本的“性爱观”由神圣转向了野蛮。从“生命观”的角度考察“性爱观”的重构，可以明确，从德川时代到当代日本，虽然在明治时代这两者都发生了变化，但不可否认的是，神圣与残暴一直并存，并使之复杂化。从日本神话中的观念到史书中的观念，两者在德川时期都是明显存在的。明治时期受生物学和进化论的影响，对“生命观”进行了重新表述，概括了生物本能的“性爱”观念。虽然说日本对生物进化论的接受特点是与社会进化论的混淆，但这种混淆在欧洲尤其是美国也同样存在。在日本，这两种进化论都被视为“天”论，这是日本的特点。日本文学中的“自然主义”将生物本能的“性爱”观念视为野蛮而广为传播，而“生命中心主义”则将其视为“宇宙生命”行为的神圣而广为传播。厨川白村站在这种“生命中心主义”的立场上，主张将古代和中世纪的神圣性改造为现代观念中的野蛮性，使性爱的神圣性转向。栗川白村的这一历史观被广泛传播，成为一种普遍的观念。事实上，这两种“性爱观”在栗川公之于当代日本之后就已经存在。